Why do you always come across like you've been personally slighted by poll results? No need to throw tantrums if the poll/thread doesn't go the way you feel.
Over the last three seasons - ROR PPG is 0.85 versus 1.02 for JT, JT is ahead by 19.5%. ROR is much better defensively. Whether that makes him equal to JT is another question, I think JT is a slightly better player right now.
Unfortunately, the league just ratified a flat cap for the next three years. JT is tied for the 5th highest cap hit in the league. The difference in contracts is $3.5 million, or 46.67%. If your premise is that JT is better offensively (which he is), but that overall this makes JT a slightly better player (which I think it does) - how do you reconcile that the difference is a 46.67% higher contract? If he is 19.5%-25% better offensively, and that's offset because of him being worse defensively - he can't be 30-40% better of a player.
ROR contract ends with the flat cap. JT is signed two more years, so although term favours JT, his contract isn't good in the short term, and the short term may result in teams have to blow things up or restructure. I would absolutely rather have ROR going forward. If the poll was, go back in time and pick the guy you wanted to draft, then it would be JT and I have no problem admitting that. Nothing to do with anti-leaf, but the league environment and time frames don't sit in JT's favour, and although I think he is the very slightly better player, he's not so much better that I would want to Oilers to inherit 11 million in cap, rather than 7.5 million in cap.