Old school vs new school style of GM. One was part of a carefully planned rebuild that has produced an unbalanced roster and the other kind of stumbled his way into a rebuild without seeming to have a plan for one.
Who is the better GM? Which would you rather have running your team?
Can I ask you a question? You are aware that Benning was basically the guy who helped turn the Bruins into a powerhouse right?
Benning right from the start had a certain type of team he wanted to build but the owners pushed for a non rebuild and Linden was loyal to the old core.
Benning did not stumble into anything he has always been a very good judge of talent and places a huge onus on character, something our young core has in spades. But the #1 thing that has impressed me about Benning is the fact that he has zero ego. He knew he made some bad trades early in his tenor and instead of doubling down he fixed them.
His last 3 trades especially the Miller trade and Pearson trade changed the entire make up of the team. No Gm is perfect obviously and the test will be to sign the young core and find gems in later rounds. I do think when it comes to re-signing the young core, we're going to see the kids take a little less to stay together. Sorry but Petey, Quinn don't strike me as the type to only chase the money.
Brock signed a very friendly deal when you look at his #s and what other guys with similar production signed last summer.