Flyers Faithful
Registered User
- Feb 12, 2016
- 744
- 868
And Ottawa would pass,he isnt worth much more ...But again he is to Ottawa2nd round pick, that's it, or a 3rd and a B/C prospect
2nd round pick, that's it, or a 3rd and a B/C prospect
Yep,bad year...Which is why we wont move him,besides most know he is better than those numbersHe scores like 30 points a yr and never passed the eye test for me (except in that one playoff game he scored 4 goals). Don’t know his advanced stats tbh but I wouldn’t offer more than a 2nd
That’s what I was thinking. I’d offer either Hagg and a second or Hagg, Laughton, and NJD’s 3rd rounder. I think Laughton would be great in OTT as a Top 9 LWPageau would be perfect as a bridge to Frost in Philly. I'd be willing to offer Hagg and a 2; it's a bit of an overpay, but we can probably afford the hit on the back end, and it perfectly fills our one remaining hole at forward.
That’s what I was thinking. I’d offer either Hagg and a second or Hagg, Laughton, and NJD’s 3rd rounder. I think Laughton would be great in OTT as a Top 9 LW
Laughton has played center for us most of his career so he could play center for you guys too. I just figured with Hoffman gone you’d need a lw and I personally like Laughton better a lw than cOttawa needs C’s more though, a top 9 LW would be at the bottom of the list. Right now you have Duchene, Pageau and Smith with experience down the middle. They have younger guys in Brown, Chlapik and White who are considered C’s but to expect two to step in right away is asking a lot.
Laughton has played center for us most of his career so he could play center for you guys too. I just figured with Hoffman gone you’d need a lw and I personally like Laughton better a lw than c
Would be a solid first pairing dman for Toronto too.He'd be solid 4th line center for Toronto