OT: Jersey Numbers

Seatoo

Never Stop Poasting
Oct 19, 2012
3,315
149
Okanagan
I've always wondered why do a lot of fans and coaches hate what I guess you could describe as "high" numbers? I remember reading on the main board that some coaches make their players have "real numbers", also in the Carolina GDT there was a comment about 65 being a "bad jersey number". Also rookies & plugs get "bad numbers" too. What's the history/story here?
 

bottomlesspop

Registered User
Nov 14, 2008
2,127
0
Vancouver
hockey is all about tradition and in the old days your goalie was 1, your D were 2-6 and your F were the higher numbers under 30 (which is a backup goalie number)

hard to pull that off w 100 year old franchises with many retired numbers though

Plus, European players seem to have a different view of this
 

Reign Nateo

Registered User
Apr 28, 2003
13,561
59
Canada
Visit site
A high number generally means you're trying to separate yourself from the group, to get noticed, or stand out. Hockey being a team game, some hockey people don't want players putting themselves above the team, get assigned a number and get to work. Some don't care.
 

BenningHurtsMySoul

Unfair Huggy Bear
Mar 18, 2008
25,263
10,916
Port Coquitlam, BC
Some unique numbers are really clever (ex. Steve Heinze taking 57). Most look terrible. I mean, come on...62, 49, 90, 86, 74 etc. They all look like ****.

90 is the ugliest for me. 91 looks awesome though.
 

Wetcoaster

Guest
I've always wondered why do a lot of fans and coaches hate what I guess you could describe as "high" numbers? I remember reading on the main board that some coaches make their players have "real numbers", also in the Carolina GDT there was a comment about 65 being a "bad jersey number". Also rookies & plugs get "bad numbers" too. What's the history/story here?
Hockey has sweaters not that 'Murican affectation of "jersey".
 

Eddy Punch Clock

Jack Adams 2028
Jun 13, 2007
13,126
1,823
Chillbillyville
I find forwards wearing low numbers to be weirder tbh.

I've said it before, Kassian doesn't suit #9.

Never thought Bieksa looked good in #3 either... I see that as a girly number for some reason..... prolly has something to do with my obsession with threesomes. :naughty:
 

Pip

Registered User
Feb 2, 2012
69,191
8,522
Granduland
BobbyRyanOttawaSenatorsNumber6SensTown.jpg


Like no, just no.
 

Street Hawk

Registered User
Feb 18, 2003
5,348
20
Visit site
I've always wondered why do a lot of fans and coaches hate what I guess you could describe as "high" numbers? I remember reading on the main board that some coaches make their players have "real numbers", also in the Carolina GDT there was a comment about 65 being a "bad jersey number". Also rookies & plugs get "bad numbers" too. What's the history/story here?

Like you said, rookies get the high numbers. Even in a call up situation, some clubs just leave the call up with their pre-season number instead of giving them a new number, under the traditional 30 for F and D.

Personally, I prefer to see players take a high number under the following situations:
1) They are very good, all-star calibre
2) It means something to the player. #65 means something for Karlsson, something representing his parents or something?

I believe Tyler Myers kept his #57 from camp cause he didn't want to change anything since he made the dam as a 19 year old.

NJ and Lou Lamorello always have their players have low numbers.

Montreal, no choice since about 1/2 of the numbers under #30 have been retired.
 

JA

Guest
It seems prospects generally receive high numbers unless they specifically request them. Alexandre Bolduc wore #49 and Mario Bliznak wore #62 while Sergei Shirokov, who would have preferred to wear #52, was forced to switch to #25 instead.

That's a bit hypocritical, in my opinion.

I posted a recent article about how adamant the Detroit Red Wings were about selecting Pavel Bure 116th overall in the sixth round of the 1989 NHL Entry Draft; they were told they could not during the fifth round, then said they would draft him "no matter what" and then settle the eligibility issue later. The Canucks took him three picks ahead of Detroit at pick #113.

I'm sure if Bure had been chosen by Detroit, not only would he have had a prosperous and highly successful career, but he would have become the definitive #96 on the Red Wings roster rather than Tomas Holmstrom.
 

Bro Horvat

2011 Truther
Mar 20, 2013
1,219
0
Vancouver
I believe New Jersey doesn't allow any player to wear a number over 35(?) - some sort of team tradition. They made an exception for Jagr apparently.
 

tc 23

#GaunceForGM
Dec 11, 2012
11,358
21
Vancouver
I believe New Jersey doesn't allow any player to wear a number over 35(?) - some sort of team tradition. They made an exception for Jagr apparently.

I believe they only make exceptions for established star players. Their organization seems very traditional.
 

LiquidSnake

Registered User
Jun 10, 2011
31,513
2
Vancouver, BC
97 looks terrible on a jersey.... bugs me all the time for some reason.

Agree with whoever said Kassian and 9. although I believe he wore 9 for the WJC as well.

Seems more like a 13.
 

Royal Canuck

Taco Enthusiast
Feb 10, 2011
12,680
536
Victoria, BC
97 looks terrible on a jersey.... bugs me all the time for some reason.

Agree with whoever said Kassian and 9. although I believe he wore 9 for the WJC as well.

Seems more like a 13.

I don't mind #97, I tried to do the same with my birth year, but #95 is the worst jersey number I can think of. I think 91,92,93,94,96,97 all look good, 98 is just too close to 99 for me.

If I were a coach, I'd leave it up to the players on whether they want 1-30 to be honest. Jersey numbers and teamwork don't have a whole lot in common.
 

Bure All Day

Registered User
Mar 29, 2012
4,978
2
Vancouver
Like other posters have said, jersey numbers used to be generally low, because it was a team game and they didn't need to have one guy stand out like that.

Today, numbers are just a special number for that person. I think everyone knows how Crosby got his number (August 7th).. Maybe for others they wear a number that a former player wore and they looked up to.

I'm not in the NHL, but I always liked 9, 10, 17, 18, 19, 21 for Kariya, Bure, Hull/Kovalchuk, random just liked the number, Naslund, Forsberg
 

Hansen

tyler motte simp
Oct 12, 2011
23,751
9,414
Nanaimo, B.C.
Personal preference, and then there are team traditions like in New Jersey.

I really want to know what numbers the Sedins wanted before Burke gave them #33 and #22 though.

As for #9 looking bad on Kassian, I like it :p:

Only number's I've ever worn are #10, #9, #5 (when the first two are taken or when I'm playing defense mostly)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad