Proposal: Jankowski to MTL?

[Fazkovsky]

What it would take?

I would love to gamble on him as habs are thin on C

To me he is a better option to RNH or a high end prospect that would cost a lot.

Click to read more...

 

[780il]

I think Calgary would only move him for an upgrade. Something you dont have.

 

[Fazkovsky]

I think Calgary would only move him for an upgrade. Something you dont have.

Really? What about a prospect like Mete+2nd? Isnt he the 3rd C ? I dont think Danault is far off from Jankowski as a player. He is good on faceoffs and can get 40 points

 

[Kahvi]

What it would take?

Young C with top6 potential signed toa reasonable contract

 

[Kahvi]

Really? What about a prospect like Mete+2nd? Isnt he the 3rd C ? I dont think Danault is far off from Jankowski as a player. He is good on faceoffs and can get 40 points

Yes, Jankowski is currently a 3C. Just like Habs, also Flames need to have a 3C in their lineup. Why would the Flames trade the one they have to Habs?

 

[Skobel24]

Flames drafted him knowing hed a project. Hes progressing well, nearly scored 20 goals in his rookie year.

I wouldn't trade him. I'd rather be patient and see what he develops into.

 

[CraigsList]

A center with a 2 bridge deal of 1.65m who projects to be a top 6 center for years to come. Yeah, he's not going anywhere.

The only guy I'd be interested in would be Gallagher, but we already know how much you guys overrate him. So, we'll keep Jankowski because he's exactly what we need.

And no, he's not better than RNH lol. Not better right now, at least.

 

[Chr1s97]

We have Poehling and Kotka that's probably have the same potentiel ceiling as him. Plus we short on LD so no way we trade Mete for this type a player + an early second rounder.

 

[CapSpace]

Really? What about a prospect like Mete+2nd? Isnt he the 3rd C ? I dont think Danault is far off from Jankowski as a player. He is good on faceoffs and can get 40 points

This is so bad I can't even... Mete and a 2nd for a 3C, are you out of your goddamn mind.

 

[BleedBlue14]

Habs need more 3C and 2W I like it.

 

[Pierre Lebrun]

Jankowski would be a good fit at C for the Habs. Better upside than Danault.

Sherbak + 2019 2nd

 

[Pierre Lebrun]

Or Lekhonen + 3rd

 

[Kahvi]

Jankowski would be a good fit at C for the Habs. Better upside than Danault.

Sherbak + 2019 2nd

Are you saying he's not a good fit at C for Flames?

 

[Bargainbin]

Really? What about a prospect like Mete+2nd? Isnt he the 3rd C ? I dont think Danault is far off from Jankowski as a player. He is good on faceoffs and can get 40 points

Why would we five up mete and a second .we have kotkaniemi and poehling coming for the top 2 spots. We can't get rid of one of our best defensive prospects for a 3rd center

 

[DarthProbert]

I disagree with a lot of the comments on this one...the Flames have Monahan, Backlund, and Lindholm at C...if Montreal offers a decent price for Jankowski, take it while his value is high. His price being low is nice and all but I don't see Cgy moving any of the other 3. Unless they can get a haul for Lindholm before he gets settled in.

 

[Kahvi]

I disagree with a lot of the comments on this one...the Flames have Monahan, Backlund, and Lindholm at C...if Montreal offers a decent price for Jankowski, take it while his value is high. His price being low is nice and all but I don't see Cgy moving any of the other 3. Unless they can get a haul for Lindholm before he gets settled in.

Yes, having any center depth is bad. You as a Montreal fan (I guess) should no that.

 

[Bounces R Way]

Unless it's for the 2019 1st I don't think the Flames would have much reason to move him. They need cheap young forward depth, Jankowski fills that need.

 

[SpeakingOfTheDevils]

This has to be the millionth “arbitrary young C of MTL” thread. Has the other fan base accepted even once?

The majority of these — if not all — are resounding rejections. Take a friggin hint. No one wants Montreal’s spare parts, especially with young players with upside going the other way. Draft your own goddamn team.

 

[Legend123]

This has to be the millionth “arbitrary young C of MTL” thread. Has the other fan base accepted even once?

The majority of these — if not all — are resounding rejections. Take a friggin hint. No one wants Montreal’s spare parts, especially with young players with upside going the other way. Draft your own goddamn team.

Damn someone's raging hard. We will gladly develop our top prospects in Poehling and Kotka. No need to acquire another Danault.

 

[Kahvi]

Damn someone's raging hard. We will gladly develop our top prospects in Poehling and Kotka. No need to acquire another Danault.

Where did someone propose Kotkaniemi for Jankowski? Of course you keep Kotkaniemi, just like Flames keep Jankowski. And I'm not saying they have equal value or are equal prospects.

 

[Legend123]

Where did someone propose Kotkaniemi for Jankowski? Of course you keep Kotkaniemi, just like Flames keep Jankowski. And I'm not saying they have equal value or are equal prospects.

I was replying to the guy who said draft ur own centers in a mockingly way

 

[DFF]

Cheap, ready to play with some upside....not easy to trade

 

[CaptainCrunch67]

Really? What about a prospect like Mete+2nd? Isnt he the 3rd C ? I dont think Danault is far off from Jankowski as a player. He is good on faceoffs and can get 40 points

Flames are all in not rebuilding so prospects aren't very interesting when Janks is already a young cheap forward who looked good on the third line.

Flames aren't trading him unless its a massive over payment, give us Montreal's first unprotected and we'll do it, other then that pass.