News Article: Jake Gardiner and the Leafs D

MastuhNinks

Registered User
Apr 30, 2011
6,203
6
The Iron Throne
I like Jake Gardiner a lot, and I'm expecting a big year from him.

That said, 'Jake Gardiner is better than Dion Phaneuf because of this spreadsheet' isn't a very strong argument. I'd be interested to see those results translates into goal totals. Y'know, goals, the thing that actually determines the final score and thus the winner of a hockey game.

Corsi tells us that Phaneuf had a bad year, actual goal totals (again, the thing that is the determining factor in winning hockey games) tell us he had a very effective year.
 

7even

Offered and lost
Feb 1, 2012
18,744
14,468
North Carolina
In my last post I wrote out the Corsi rates (table at the bottom) of the six defensive pairing combinations that were together for more than 200 minutes in 2013-14. What stood out was Jake Gardiner and Morgan Rielly, posting an elite-level 54.6% Corsi rate on a team where so many players fail to crack 45%.

That stands out. That's the highlighted section. The next two highest Corsi rates for a defensive pairing also happen to have Jake Gardiner on them. That also stands out. It's no secret that the Maple Leafs are a team that struggles with puck possession, but they also happen to have a player who struggles a visibly less.

That's pretty impressive. Even if you're not a Corsi fan, that's like having a player with a +/- of +10 on a team where nobody else did better than a -5. The deviation is what's important.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
33,067
11,081
That's pretty impressive. Even if you're not a Corsi fan, that's like having a player with a +/- of +10 on a team where nobody else did better than a -5. The deviation is what's important.

Carl Gunnarsson is a bit of an anomoly to me, our best +/- on a team with not great +/- however his corsi was kind of bad i believe.
 

Hockey Talker29

Registered User
Oct 10, 2003
4,489
309
Toronto
Visit site
This just lends to the argument that Jake is a very talented young defenseman, who is a key piece of this team's future.

He's already a very strong possession player, which we're seeing is more and more important for sustained success in the NHL.
 

The Winter Soldier

Registered User
Apr 4, 2011
70,823
21,053
Never heard of Cam Charron. What media outlet is he associated with?

He's a blogger with a decided slant on analytics for players he either likes or dislikes for Pension puppets and Maple Leafs hot stove forum or some forgettable name run by Dangle.

Terrible hockey blogger that Bozak pretty drove into seclusion last year.

Read at your own peril is my advice.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,974
39,723
He's a blogger with a decided slant on analytics for players he either likes or dislikes for Pension puppets and Maple Leafs hot stove forum or some forgettable name run by Dangle.

Terrible hockey blogger that Bozak pretty drove into seclusion last year.

Read at your own peril is my advice.

I don't read bloggers, no different than a post here.

So this isn't a "News Article" then?
 

maketrades

Registered User
May 30, 2014
738
0
Great article. Makes a good point about no separation between Gardiner and Phaneuf and that it's really all because Gardiner loses the puck when he's making flashy plays, which are more noticeable.
 

Cap'n Flavour

Registered User
Mar 8, 2004
4,963
1,667
Flavour Country
Sorry I can't digest this blog post, I'm too busy reading real incisive news articles by professional, award-winning journalists like Damien Cox and Steve Simmons.
 

Kyle93

Registered User
Mar 30, 2012
34,749
57
Great article. Makes a good point about no separation between Gardiner and Phaneuf and that it's really all because Gardiner loses the puck when he's making flashy plays, which are more noticeable.

Wat.jpeg
 

Cap'n Flavour

Registered User
Mar 8, 2004
4,963
1,667
Flavour Country

The point would be that Gardiner does just as well playing against the star forwards Phaneuf went up against, albeit in less ice time. The argument that Gardiner can't handle tough competition or only seems to do well because he gets easy minutes is quite a lot weaker with this evidence.

The caveats are that while this analysis does control for quality of competition, since the stats are against the same opponent (though maybe not exactly the same line every time), it doesn't control for zone starts and quality of teammates. Since Gardiner was stuck with Franson for a lot of the year, while Phaneuf had a stable partner in Gunnarsson, the latter point might be in Gardiner's favour. It also depends which forwards they played with during this time. I can't imagine there's a significant difference there, though, because Randy does love his line matching.
 

Kubus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2014
803
31
I'm just happy we have this kid. The kid is silk on skates, and I don't think he has reached his full potential. He might not be a "#1" but the kid will make a very solid top 4 guy.

The problem is the fans and the media not Gardiner. People are not happy with a top 4 guy, we are always looking for a savior, hoping one player can change the fate of a team.
 

Jacquestrapless

Registered User
Jun 5, 2011
3,009
2,149
Mississauga
I'm just happy we have this kid. The kid is silk on skates, and I don't think he has reached his full potential. He might not be a "#1" but the kid will make a very solid top 4 guy.

The problem is the fans and the media not Gardiner. People are not happy with a top 4 guy, we are always looking for a savior, hoping one player can change the fate of a team.

No kidding. Kadri gets dumped on for not being the 1c we want (yet). I imagine if Rielly struggles next season, trolls will be out in full force.
 

Bullseye

Registered User
Jun 14, 2012
6,931
370
Niagara
I'm just happy we have this kid. The kid is silk on skates, and I don't think he has reached his full potential. He might not be a "#1" but the kid will make a very solid top 4 guy.

The problem is the fans and the media not Gardiner. People are not happy with a top 4 guy, we are always looking for a savior, hoping one player can change the fate of a team.

I don't see how Carlyle is the author of non-puck-possession hockey. It's against what he believes. Get puck from other team, keep puck (meaning make the right pass, do not get bodied off it, skate it out of trouble). Toronto was bad under Wilson as well. Toronto was terrible before Phaneuf arrived here. People have short memories.

I think Carlyle is selfish - I think he wants his team to get possession and then not lose it!

I agree with one thing in this article - hockey is a game of scoring and prevention of scoring but I disagree with the two being equal. Prevention of scoring is far more important because it leads to more scoring chances than the other team measured by time of possession and shots on goal. The Leafs proved that being outshot all the time only works for awhile. The goalie should not be the best goal preventer on the team - he should be excellent at it but the team itself should stop the puck more often than the goalie by superior puck possession. Make the other teams goalie be the best goal preventer not yours. Eventually you overwhelm him though.
 

JackJ

Registered User
Feb 7, 2012
5,330
0
Make or break season for Gardiner as a Leaf. IMO he'll start the season paired with Phaneuf.
 

The Winter Soldier

Registered User
Apr 4, 2011
70,823
21,053
I don't read bloggers, no different than a post here.

So this isn't a "News Article" then?

I don't either, if you want good hockey opinions based on real knowledgable hockey people, you wouldn't go read it from a Highschool newspaper either.
 

cack

Registered User
Jul 30, 2013
531
0
Jake Gardiner and Morgan Rielly are important to the Leafs future. In other news water is wet.
 

The Winter Soldier

Registered User
Apr 4, 2011
70,823
21,053
Jake Gardiner and Morgan Rielly are important to the Leafs future. In other news water is wet.

One of the above is true.

I never understood the need to lump in a lower ceiling player with a higher ceiling player. Rielly blows Gardiner away as a defenceman if they both reach their potential.
 

cack

Registered User
Jul 30, 2013
531
0
One of the above is true.

I never understood the need to lump in a lower ceiling player with a higher ceiling player. Rielly blows Gardiner away as a defenceman if they both reach their potential.


Not exactly. Morgan Rielly becoming a better player does not mean Jake Gardiner would not be important.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad