Well, they will take whoever is left from Daniels/Maye. Brissett allows them to sit whichever guy they draft. More likely to sit Maye over Daniels just due to the number of college starts.Thought he was going to be the guy.
Drafting Maye now?
We'll see...
Yeah, but really, best for his career to move on since they are going to focus their attention on the QB they draft at 3.Nathan Rourke remains the best QB on the Patriots roster after this move, IMO.
Yeah, but really, best for his career to move on since they are going to focus their attention on the QB they draft at 3.
I did think last season, that he needed to have a 2 year play. Year 1, likely PS, then year 2 backup. But, that only made sense if he remained on the same roster. Going from JAX to NE late, not great.
He was on the PS, so I believe they have the option to either remain on the PS or get signed (more money since he has to be on NE's main roster I believe).
Didn't think Jax made sense given that you typically do not see teams wanting 2 younger QBs as the top 2 guys. Felt Min, SEA, and others were a better fit on this 2 year plan. In SEA, no Lock and in Minny, it's Hall who didn't show well and Darnold barring them drafting a QB.
That's why it was a massive decision where he signed last season. Track had to give him a legit shot at Backup. Didn't think Jax made sense. NFL values experience and those guys, even in losses like Mullens, Beathread, Dobbs, Trubisky, etc who have 12 or more starts under their belt will be valued as a backup over someone without exp.Yup don't disagree with you at all. He's signed a 1 year RFA tender, it's likely NE brings him into camp. Which is worst case scenario cause with a rookie at 3 plus it being a TC battle, likely those 2 get most/all the preseason snaps. So Rourke may get limited reps in pre-season as well. Along with new staff that had no part in picking him, it's just bad fit this year.
It'll be interesting to see which PS he bounces too after he gets cut.