Gabrielor
"Win with us or watch us win." - Rasmus Dahlin
How does Quinn look like Nylander?
Neither was the best player available when we picked.
How does Quinn look like Nylander?
We took the top goal-scorer in the draft, he could very well be the best. However, he is not a pony with one trick, which is also great.Neither was the best player available when we picked.
They're saying that Rossi is more developed physically so is close to his peak aka lower ceiling in not much more growth potential whilst Quinn has more room to grow. Now that doesn't mean Rossi ceiling is lower it just means metaphorically he's the 6'4" senior compared to the gangly 6' freshman that someone prognasticates will grow into a 6'6 beast.I'm not sure I'm tracking: the dude who's almost 2 pts/game doesn't have a higher ceiling?
These are useless comparisons. Because you can't just look at statistics. We know that Rossi has been playing hockey since childhood and worked a lot. Quinn, on the contrary, relatively recently began to take hockey seriously, he blossomed late and made the big jump as he began to take hockey seriously. They have different anthropometry, positions, style of play, characters. This makes sense, you are not looking only at statistics or analytics when choosing a player to draft, you are considering all factors. Rossi could probably be the safer choice, but that doesn't mean Adams should have chosen the safer choice. Quinn has a high ceiling and is already doing great, and this is a guy who only started getting serious about hockey for a couple of years. Also have you read about Krueger, Rossi and Quinn?
Posting this again for those who missed it. While I still don’t quite get taking Jack over Rossi, these quotes from scouts make me feel very intrigued by his upside. Really excited to see how his game progresses going forward.
we do not know that yet.. Quinn path and highlights w his drive are intriguing as is his ceilingNeither was the best player available when we picked.
Yep. The stats are the stats, but the Sabres crew are definitely not the only people who watched a bunch of 67s games and came away with the conclusion that Quinn was the best player on their roster. Time will tell.
Red Tilson Trophy - WikipediaRossi was the OHL MVP. So, the majority opinion is that Rossi was the better player.
And this isn't about who was the better player last year. It's who will be a better player in the NHL. The main reasons to believe that Quinn will be better are the late bloomer factor with Quinn and the difference in size and skillset.
we do not know that yet.. Quinn path and highlights w his drive are intriguing as is his ceiling
Rossi was the OHL MVP. So, the majority opinion is that Rossi was the better player.
And this isn't about who was the better player last year. It's who will be a better player in the NHL. The main reasons to believe that Quinn will be better are the late bloomer factor with Quinn and the difference in size and skillset.
I'm amazed at how much the boards think Adams is returded
I don't anyone thinks that...I think a lot of the boards think he made a bad first pick. Certainly doesn't get full judgement on one mistake, and thankfully, while I hate the mistake, it's not like he went crazily off the board. Quinn was a prospect solidly in the next tier.
I preferred the player with the same exact drive, who scored more, and saw the tougher matchups.
I don't anyone thinks that...I think a lot of the boards think he made a bad first pick. Certainly doesn't get full judgement on one mistake, and thankfully, while I hate the mistake, it's not like he went crazily off the board. Quinn was a prospect solidly in the next tier.
This is all personal opinion. Draft people like Button had Quinn over Rossi. Button bases his rankings on projecting these kids as NHL players in the future. Some of the scouts notes from above have Quinn over Rossi too. Brian Burke liked the pick when it was made too. None of them were questioning the pick. Saying Quinn was clearly in a class below is just personal opinion and not based on fact. Saying the pick was a mistake is just personal opinion as well. We shall see how things go. I don’t like the comparison to Nylander. Nylander was lazy and that was mentioned in his scouting reports. He didn’t assert himself and didn’t care about the defensive aspect of the game. Quinn is the polar opposite.I don't anyone thinks that...I think a lot of the boards think he made a bad first pick. Certainly doesn't get full judgement on one mistake, and thankfully, while I hate the mistake, it's not like he went crazily off the board. Quinn was a prospect solidly in the next tier.
You mean the guy who has played hockey for way longer, who was much more physically developed, and from what I've read played with two pretty good overagers instead of a rookie and a ~6th round pick? Same guy.
It is not a mistake at this moment in time.
This is all personal opinion. Draft people like Button had Quinn over Rossi. Button bases his rankings on projecting these kids as NHL players in the future. Some of the scouts notes from above have Quinn over Rossi too. Brian Burke liked the pick when it was made too. None of them were questioning the pick. Saying Quinn was clearly in a class below is just personal opinion and not based on fact. Saying the pick was a mistake is just personal opinion as well. We shall see how things go. I don’t like the comparison to Nylander. Nylander was lazy and that was mentioned in his scouting reports. He didn’t assert himself and didn’t care about the defensive aspect of the game. Quinn is the polar opposite.
I like Rossi a lot and thinks he fits Minnesota like a glove. I am ready to watch Quinn develop. If he continues to grow and turns into a 40 goal scorer he is good defensively and can play PK then that is a home run pick.
If you think Quinn was the pick, stand by that. Don't leave yourself room to back-track later.
I thought Nylander was the wrong pick the day he was drafted (would've gone Chychrun). I was right.
I thought Mittelstadt was the wrong pick the day he was drafted (would've gone Vilardi). It was dicey for a bit, but I'm trending right.
I thought Cozens was the wrong pick the day he was drafted (would've gone Krebs). I'm trending to be wrong.
I think Quinn was the wrong pick. I'll happily be wrong, but I'm not going to be afraid of that.
Why do people care about this? Wasn’t Mittelstadt once #1? Absolutely meaningless.NHL prospect rankings: Wheeler's top 50, post-2020 draft edition
(Pay-locked)
3. Marco Rossi
8. Dylan Cozens
48. Jack Quinn
One man's opinion...blah blah blah...I think Quinn is too low, but I definitely agree with the ordering of Rossi > Cozens > Quinn.
Brian Burke liking a pick is the exact opposite of a good sign.This is all personal opinion. Draft people like Button had Quinn over Rossi. Button bases his rankings on projecting these kids as NHL players in the future. Some of the scouts notes from above have Quinn over Rossi too. Brian Burke liked the pick when it was made too. None of them were questioning the pick. Saying Quinn was clearly in a class below is just personal opinion and not based on fact. Saying the pick was a mistake is just personal opinion as well. We shall see how things go. I don’t like the comparison to Nylander. Nylander was lazy and that was mentioned in his scouting reports. He didn’t assert himself and didn’t care about the defensive aspect of the game. Quinn is the polar opposite.
I like Rossi a lot and thinks he fits Minnesota like a glove. I am ready to watch Quinn develop. If he continues to grow and turns into a 40 goal scorer he is good defensively and can play PK then that is a home run pick.
Yeah Pronman LOVED Mitts. These so called draft experts always have their personal favourites and they seem to love to go down with the ship over them.Why do people care about this? Wasn’t Mittelstadt once #1? Absolutely meaningless.
Not in the draft, though. The top prospect lists are usually way worse than draft lists. They are dominated by players who had good WJCs.Why do people care about this? Wasn’t Mittelstadt once #1? Absolutely meaningless.