The problem is guys don't get more skilled at this age. Players learn how to better use their skill, but no one develops a good wrist shot in the NHL, to pick an example. They either have it or they don't.
He has no finish. I was sweating bullets when he was awarded a penalty shot yesterday, because I have no faith in his ability to actually find the twine. Sure enough he sends it 2 feet wide from about 2 feet out. He looks fantastic up until it's time to cash in on the offensive rush. We'd have been better off with a 2 minute powerplay...even when our PP is not hitting on all cylinders.
He kind of reminds me of Erik Cole, but with a worse shot.
Or Oleksiak or Nichushkin...
Oleksiak, is more understandable. There were no fallers that year. He was not a reach like Campbell was.
Val...I can't speak to because I wasn't following the Stars that year, but I'd have probably been OK with that pick given where he was ranked.
Guryanov was more like Campbell in that he was a guy who most of us think could have been had later in the 1st or in the 2nd...Barzal was the Fowler this year. I have no idea why he slid so far, unless it was for character reasons. Barzal is having a breakout season so far with 20 points through the 1st 10 games. My money is on him playing for the Isles next season...maybe gets a few games after the Junior season is over or in the playoffs. Guryanov is still a big wildcard and it's way too early to tell, but it just kills me to see us go against the grain and pick a Russian. I'd hate to see us in a situation where we are stuck in signing him to a one-way contract and rushing his development like what happened with Val. Good thing is it sounds like his shot is WAY better than Val's.
I just think that unless you feel that Guryanov is heads above a guy like Barzal, or unless Barzal is a headcase, locker room cancer-type...you take the blue-chip Canadian Center from a risk-management perspective. Less possible negative outcomes, less complicated.