Noted hockey stats man Tyler Dellow spun some numbers on the proposals over the weekend along these lines and ultimately determined that "we’re talking about an awfully small difference on the team level" that amounts to as little as $2.7-million a season.
Jiggy deflected this question in the last thread so I'll ask it again:
Many NHL teams are losing money, which means they have to cut costs. What costs do you (or any pro-NHLPA poster) suggest they cut if they aren't allowed to cut player's salaries?
Jiggy deflected this question in the last thread so I'll ask it again:
Many NHL teams are losing money, which means they have to cut costs. What costs do you (or any pro-NHLPA poster) suggest they cut if they aren't allowed to cut player's salaries?
My bet is we get hockey started at Thanksgiving weekend(when NBC's coverage kicks in) it gives enough time for the Winter classic and 24/7. Plus it gives abut a 65-70 game season.
Jiggy deflected this question in the last thread so I'll ask it again:
Many NHL teams are losing money, which means they have to cut costs. What costs do you (or any pro-NHLPA poster) suggest they cut if they aren't allowed to cut player's salaries?
Jiggy deflected this question in the last thread so I'll ask it again:
Many NHL teams are losing money, which means they have to cut costs. What costs do you (or any pro-NHLPA poster) suggest they cut if they aren't allowed to cut player's salaries?
"This is a standard approach, I think it was done in the NBA in the same way," Fehr told ESPN.com Thursday. "Review the history here: they make a proposal, it's essentially a take it or leave it, we respond on the core economics, they take 10 minutes and say no. They tell all the players if we're agreeable to everything except the Make Whole (provision), including all the stuff that's in there, I can give Gary a telephone call. And then we have made several efforts, including yesterday, to say we're prepared to sit down and negotiate with no pre-conditions. They essentially said 'No.'
"It takes two to negotiate. They seem to be really good at imposing deadlines and issuing ultimatums and having lockouts. It seems to be something they're well-practiced at."
1. Sell to a businessman who can manage competently.
2. Trade players for picks, sign Minimum wage players.
Proskauer Rose scripted lockout.
I'm not sure why anyone of us check in, to be honest. We just check the dates of the NBA offers.
You can't just sign minimum wage because there is a salary floor. Do you understand how the system work in the NHL?
1. Sell to a businessman who can manage competently.
2. Trade players for picks, sign Minimum wage players.
The can prepare all they want - it isn't happening.
The NHLPA feels like that gave up massive concessions last time, and now the owners want MORE.
They aren't going to just say "Yes Sir".
With Fehr in the drivers seat, they'll stand pat for an entire year, and we'll lose the season.
This Lockout comes down to the last Lockout and CBA. The NHLPA pretty much blew up last time around, and the players feel they got taken to the cleaners.
That won't happen this time around.
We'll lose a season. This will be made official when the Winter Classic enters the chopping block. The owners will get fed up, and end the entire season.
1. Sell to a businessman who can manage competently.
2. Trade players for picks, sign Minimum wage players.
You're one fighting for linkage. Jesus Christ.
What were the dates of the NBA offers?
I am not fighting for anything. MOD
Also where are all these people who are going to buy a hockey team that is losing money?
It's not the players' job to make sure that every business in the league can compete with NYR and Toronto.
The league needs to take some responsiblity here, too.
Overall, the business is profitable.
Many departments are profitable. Many are on the bubble. Many are losing money.
but overall, the business is profitable.
So how about we correct the problem in a 50/50 manner.
Let's determine how much revenue is needed to help the poor franchises.
The players will go 50 percent of the way. The rich teams can go the other 50 percent.
Instead of the 90/10 proposal being demanded by the owners today