Let's try this
Dubinsky
Milano
2019 First
Harrington
for
Clutterbuck
Dal Colle
Calgary 2nd 2019
Nelson
I'm thinking this needs to be tweeked
That's not bad from a Jackets perspective.
I was thinking along the lines of:
Dubinsky
Milano
2019 First
For
Nelson
.
Because GOOD LONG ISLAND BOY!Lol why would Columbus do this
Good call Dano and exactly right it's why so many Islander fans don't understand the capJust so y'all know what to expect, here's what taking on a salary like Dubinsky's would mean for NYI in 2020-2021: it would mean approximately 75 million in cap for 20 players assuming that Barzal gets 10 million AAV, Lee is resigned at 7MAAV, Eberle is let go, Beavillier and Pulock are given long term deals (I guessed 11 million AAV between them), NYI have 2 players on ELC's (Dobson, Wahlstrom), and 2 goalies signed very cheaply (3 million between them). Basically, that means NYI won't be able to sign any mid to high end free agent until the offseason of 2021 unless the cap rises significantly.
NYI taking big salary for the next two seasons is an easy call - NYI should do it. Once you push into 2020-2021 the calculation gets much more difficult.
I'm really hoping that "cal 2" isn't a roundabout way of saying Clutterbuck, because if so this is a trash offer.would cbj be interested in cal 2 for ryan murray ?
I say no from a Jackets perspective. Mayybe if you remove the 1st rounder.
What I'd do is sit Torts down in front of some video of Nelson, and measure his blood pressure while he watches. If he's still healthy by the end of it and says he wants to work with this player, then you maybe do it. Milano's upside though scares me.
Obviously, the first rounder is the key to NYI taking on that salary.
Given Islanders needs for Center depth and us having the market cornered on Bottom 6 wingers I would actually do Dubinsky for Clutterbuck(saves Columbus 2.5M in capspace)
Obviously, the first rounder is the key to NYI taking on that salary.
.
I would too, but CBJ wouldn't. Maybe if their contracts expired the same year, but they don't.
You really should be more interested in Milano than a mid-to-late first rounder. Too bad you signed Komarov and are stuck with Ladd, because I think Milano is already far better than both, and has a lot of upside.
This is outdated thinking from the days when "third line" meant "checking line". He'd have to be on a semisheltered scoring line to be most effective right now, but just because he's not a checker doesn't mean 40+ points or bust.Milano is one of thsoe guys that should be top 6 or bust.
This is outdated thinking from the days when "third line" meant "checking line". He'd have to be on a semisheltered scoring line to be most effective right now, but just because he's not a checker doesn't mean 40+ points or bust.
Really? I thought the knock on Milano was his lack of 200 ft game.You really should be more interested in Milano than a mid-to-late first rounder. Too bad you signed Komarov and are stuck with Ladd, because I think Milano is already far better than both, and has a lot of upside.
You really should be more interested in Milano than a mid-to-late first rounder. Too bad you signed Komarov and are stuck with Ladd, because I think Milano is already far better than both, and has a lot of upside.
Really? I thought the knock on Milano was his lack of 200 ft game.
I cannot stand Ladd's offensive decline while on that big contract,but I have no real complaint about his defense.
I think Ladd has a full nmc this seasonI'm personally not interested in middling LW'ers at all. Komorov was a culture signing (yes, whatever that means). And while I can't speak for LL, I suspect Ladd is either going to be dumped or he's going to be the richest guy on the Bridgeport bus sooner than later.
At any rate, Milano + Dubinsky's contract alone is not something I find interesting at all.