miscs75
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2014
- 5,941
- 5,634
He gets his info around the league from Eklund and TSN.You can just admit you don't know who Pulock is.
He gets his info around the league from Eklund and TSN.You can just admit you don't know who Pulock is.
Guy gets a Norris trophy vote 2 years ago and is a 4th or 5th on most teams lol. So your saying there is 130+ d men better than him?I'm sure Isles fans would be salivating at this.....a 90-100 point forward who can play either center or wing; for a d-man who ranks as a 4-5 on most depth charts. And the Canaucks also toss in a second rounder?
They'd burn Allvin in effigy in Vancouver if he ever even entertained such a transaction.
OEL is getting paid more than two mil more than Pulock and Ryan McDonagh would still be on the Lightning if they weren’t in cap hell.I do, too.
But he's on an OEL contract.
You're going to get good value in the next couple years and then he's going to Ryan McDonagh and you're going to be stuck with an absolute albatross for the last few years of that deal. And the good bit will be when we're not competing and then the bad bit will be when we're trying to open a contending window.
If his contract was 4 or 5 years, it's a different story.
$1M(Arizona is picking up $1M) and Tampa isn’t in cap hell enough to resign 3 key RFA’s to massive extensions. They’re just smart enough to see the writing on the wall and dumped McDonagh now before his contract required sweetener to dump.OEL is getting paid more than two mil more than Pulock and Ryan McDonagh would still be on the Lightning if they weren’t in cap hell.
Yes, he's an awesome rental. He'd be great for that one year until he wants 9 plus on a 7 or 8 year deal that takes him into his late 30's (like OEL...gonna be sweet paying him 10.5 in salary next offseason)If you're trading for Miller you're trading for a guy who represents a massive value surplus relative to his cap hit for next year - a 99 point #1C getting paid $5.2 million.
This isn't 1995. You're trading for contracts, not players,
Again, who has more trade value : OEL or Scott Mayfield?
No, two mil. OEL is making 8 million this year, and I’m extremely aware that Arizona is retaining on part of that.$1M(Arizona is picking up $1M) and Tampa isn’t in cap hell enough to resign 3 key RFA’s to massive extensions. They’re just smart enough to see the writing on the wall and dumped McDonagh now before his contract required sweetener to dump.
Why does Vancouver care what he’s actually earning though? The $7M figure is ALL that matters as that is the “OEL contract” they traded for.No, two mil. OEL is making 8 million this year, and I’m extremely aware that Arizona is retaining on part of that.
Yes, he's an awesome rental. He'd be great for that one year until he wants 9 plus on a 7 or 8 year deal that takes him into his late 30's (like OEL...gonna be sweet paying him 10.5 in salary next offseason)
He's worth a B+ prospect and a first rounder in 2023. I hope Vancouver gets that from someone.
Mayfield obviously has more value. He's younger and when resigned will cost half as much as OEL. Considering Mayfield's just as good, equal or slightly worse than OEL while being 3 to 4 million less a season it's a pretty obvious call.
You're getting less value with OEL's contract and much more from Mayfield. Much like how you would get more value with Pulock signed and less once Miller gets his asking price on the next contract.
Was Vancouver not responsible for the 5.25 signing bonus that was paid out recently (his salary is only 5.25 this season). Whoever's responsible for his salary the next two years isn't going to be seeing much value though, 10.25 in 23-24?Why does Vancouver care what he’s actually earning though? The $7M figure is ALL that matters as that is the “OEL contract” they traded for.
No, two mil. OEL is making 8 million this year, and I’m extremely aware that Arizona is retaining on part of that.
No idea how they worked that out. Salary has never been a concern though for Vancouver.Was Vancouver not responsible for the 5.25 signing bonus that was paid out recently (his salary is only 5.25 this season). Whoever's responsible for his salary the next two years isn't going to be seeing much value though, 10.25 in 23-24?
But wasn't it, in fact, the droid they were looking for?As a NYI fan, I'm definitely comfortable letting the first half play out without making a deal anything resembling this.
As the phrase goes, this not the droid we're looking for.
Nope. Saw that Droid break down cross town, and in Tampa Bay.But wasn't it, in fact, the droid they were looking for?
Wtf? Its a great contract. Are you familiar with Pulock?I don't know if I'd take Pulock for free on that contract.
Welcome to the fanbase of Canadian hockey teams. Everyone we have is Wayne Gretzky in his prime and you’re only offering us Jason Doig in return.
Going further, I hope that our salaries actually cause our ownership group to hemorrhage money to the point of crippling poverty.No idea how they worked that out. Salary has never been a concern though for Vancouver.
Well, tied for 7th...with the Islanders.Well then Myers for Barzal, Myers is a RHD and the canucks had the 5th best GA in the NHL last year.
Wtf? Its a great contract. Are you familiar with Pulock?
Might as well toss in the OEL contract if you’re trying to clean house.Well then Myers for Barzal, Myers is a RHD and the canucks had the 5th best GA in the NHL last year.
Again :
Very good player right now.
Crazy term on contract that is hugely likely to turn into a negative-value albatross in the back half of the deal.
TIL that $7 million to OEL as a #3/maybe #2 defender until age 36 = worst contract ever, but $6 million to Ryan Pulock as a #3/maybe #2 defender until age 36 = OMG amazing contract huge value asset.