DetBigWangs
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2009
- 2,215
- 0
He could make the big club. It's possible. But it would be nearly as unlikely as you winning the powerball jackpot this next drawing on one ticket.
You can joke about that, unless Tatar and Sammy are shipped off then that percentage is 0.
A 1st, Tatar, and Sammy for Hudler?
Can anyone see him playing any pre-season games?
If you guys think Mantha has a shot to play based on the camp he has, you don't follow the Red Wings closely.
October 2011. Nyquist lit up the Traverse City Tournament, then played on a top 6 line for the NHL pre-season and put up 5 points in 5 games, including a 2 goal 1 assist night. Babcock said during the midst of this "He looks like an NHL player to me".
....And he still caught the first flight to GR to start the season.
Absolutely 0% chance this kid makes the Wings out of camp.
If Smith and Nyquist didn't make the Wings in 2011 based on the camps they had, there's no way in hell Mantha does this year.
What if he lights up the AHL for 80 goals and 200 pts?
0% chance is hyperbole. A miniscule chance is more appropriate. I can't honestly say that it's a physical impossibility. Just a very very rare occurence.
One cant do Hudler's contract. Two this is bit much tatar and first for hudler?
if Mantha lights up the AHL next year, then he's definitely going to make the Wings, because he can do the impossible. Mantha is not eligible to play in the AHL next year.What if he lights up the AHL for 80 goals and 200 pts?
0% chance is hyperbole. A miniscule chance is more appropriate. I can't honestly say that it's a physical impossibility. Just a very very rare occurence.
if Mantha lights up the AHL next year, then he's definitely going to make the Wings, because he can do the impossible. Mantha is not eligible to play in the AHL next year.
and we thought Datsyuk was a magician...
Touche.
But you catch my drift. Is there a level of performance that cannot be ignored?
That's why I don't understand why he was still there when the Wings picked. The compete level concern must have been absolutely major, because he's got sky high upside. I'm not sure if I should be baffled or just worried.I think he has a shot to make it quicker then most recent picks. Hes huge, a little mean and a goalscorer which are lacking.
That's why I don't understand why he was still there when the Wings picked. The compete level concern must have been absolutely major, because he's got sky high upside. I'm not sure if I should be baffled or just worried.
"Mantha will be as good as, if not better than, Perry" - Bench
I've heard lots of criticism about him due to being an "overager."
Perry was a late 1st pick, at 28. Getzlaf was picked at 19th. Shea Weber was picked 49th. These things happen.
Now I'm not saying he's one of those guys, but I'm sure there were folks asking the same exact questions you are right now about Perry in 2003.
Sure, if Mantha was an unstoppable machine that looked like a young Mario Lemiuex or something.
But the chances of that about about zero.