Is it better to have balanced team and not top heavy talent?

Discussion in 'Montreal Canadiens' started by Habs4ever, Feb 21, 2013.

  1. Habs4ever

    Habs4ever Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Montreal, (Quebec)
    Home Page:
    Hello guys, it seems that habs are performing at a better rate with everybody chipping in rather then few guys carrying the load.

    In terms of coaching strategy it is very hard to prepare for balanced team as team can find scoring from different line combination which makes it tough for opponents to focus on particular line.

    Lot of people hate that we don't have a heavy talent team but I am loving this; it makes for an exciting game every game, as the effort and goals are very evenly spread out in the team.
     
  2. Out East

    Out East Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Pastor
    Location:
    Halifax NS
    A lot of people are infatuated with the flashy players and think you can't win without them but hockey is a team sport and superstars are not necessary for success.

    I am loving this too, not only because the team is balanced and has a lot of good players but because there are a lot of character guys. Prust left NYR and Nash came. They miss Prust. People overestimate flashy players and underestimate the importance of guys like Prust.
     
  3. vokiel

    vokiel #MolsonIsntWine

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,329
    Likes Received:
    986
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lead Java Dev
    Location:
    Montréal
    It's better to have a good game plan with the personnel you have at your disposal period.
     
  4. CanadianSharks

    CanadianSharks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    30,180
    Likes Received:
    2,035
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Right now we're well balanced, but once guys like Galchenyuk, Collberg and Gallagher reach their primes, we could have a relatively top heavy team with good depth.
     
  5. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Try finding a cup winning team without a superstar on it. There are very few. Most have multiple superstars.

    It's not question of either or... you need both.
     
  6. D4nY

    D4nY Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i dont remember the last team to won the cup without superstars. i think the last one might be the 93 habs
     
  7. vokiel

    vokiel #MolsonIsntWine

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,329
    Likes Received:
    986
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lead Java Dev
    Location:
    Montréal
    The hurricanes in 2006?
     
  8. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Patrick Roy isn't a superstar?
     
  9. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    They and the Lightning come the closest.

    Staal though was a top ten scorer that year. Not really a superstar.

    Tampa had Lecavalier, Richards and St. Louis. Only St. Louis might qualify.

    Other than those two possible teams every other club has at least one. Most have more than one.
     
  10. LeHab

    LeHab Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    2,509
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Top heavy for me.

    Average players can be had via trades or UFA. Stars not so much.
     
  11. vokiel

    vokiel #MolsonIsntWine

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,329
    Likes Received:
    986
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lead Java Dev
    Location:
    Montréal
    Yes, it depends on who qualify as star player for the person making the observation. Both Damphousse & Muller had close to 100 points when the habs won in 93 also.
     
  12. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    93 had one superstar: Roy.

    70s Habs: Lafleur,Robinson,Dryden etc
    Islanders: Bossy,Potvin,Trottier
    Oilers: Gretz,Mess,Coffey etc
    Flames: McIniss,Gilmour
    Pens:Lemieux,Jagr
    Rangers:Leetch,Mess
    Avs:Forsberg,Sakic,Roy
    Devs:Niedermayer,Brodeur
    Wings: Yzerman,Lidstrom,Fedorov etc
    Stars: Modano,Belfour
    Pens:Crosby,Malkin
    Wings: Datsyuk,Lidstrom
    Bruins:Chara,Thomas
    Ducks:Selanne,Niedermayer,Pronger
    Kings: Doughty,Quick
    Hawks:Toews,Kane,Hossa,Kieth

    Superstars are important.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2013
  13. vokiel

    vokiel #MolsonIsntWine

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,329
    Likes Received:
    986
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lead Java Dev
    Location:
    Montréal
    Yes well, I think the habs were stacked:

    [​IMG]

    That was a pretty good team :nod:
     
  14. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Sure. But it's not a cup calibre team without Roy.
     
  15. vokiel

    vokiel #MolsonIsntWine

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,329
    Likes Received:
    986
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lead Java Dev
    Location:
    Montréal
    Not sure about that, I was too young and a fan of the Pens ;)

    Would the Hurricanes have won the cup in 2006 without Staal? Hard question to answer.
     
  16. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Trust me, they don't make it past round one vs. Quebec without Roy.
    No way they win the cup without him.
     
  17. PricerStopDaPuck

    PricerStopDaPuck #PrayForBozon

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2012
    Messages:
    2,506
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    Last team to win cup without superstar..... Kings all you need is a hot goalie quick is awesome but I don't know about a superstar kopitar is good aswell but not a super star. Doughty.......no.
     
  18. DAChampion

    DAChampion Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Messages:
    21,993
    Likes Received:
    8,232
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Kopitar >>> Desharnais
    Brown > Pacioretty
    Quick >= Price
    Doughty >> Markov
    Scuderi ~ Gorges
    Richards > Plekanec
    Carter > Cole
    Vonyov << subban

    LA Kings are a bad comparison imo. They were more top heavy.
     
  19. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Even if you don't accept Kopitar or Doughty (and I think Doughty qualifies) how can you say Quick wasn't a superstar? .929 save percentage and a GAA under 2? That's crazy.

    The Kings and Hawks were a lot like the Flames... if you want to be picky you could say no superstars (though I'd disagree) but at the very least all three of these teams were packed with stars... Toews,Kane,Keith,Hossa... maybe not superstars but all very close. Flames had Niewendyke, Suter, Gilmour, McInnis,Fleury,Roberts... stupidly good. Kings had Quick,Kopitar,Doughty...

    I'd say all those teams had at least one superstar but they all definitely had at least three or more players who were stars or borderline superstars.
     
  20. PricerStopDaPuck

    PricerStopDaPuck #PrayForBozon

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2012
    Messages:
    2,506
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    You think brown is better then patches?granted he was great in the playoffs but I would take patches over brown any day
     
  21. PricerStopDaPuck

    PricerStopDaPuck #PrayForBozon

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2012
    Messages:
    2,506
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    I would also call Richards plekanec a =
     
  22. Lafleurs Guy

    Lafleurs Guy RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    52,801
    Likes Received:
    10,245
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Way I'd look at it is how good we'll be in the future (say two or three years)

    Kopitar vs Galchenyuk - (we can only hope)
    Carter vs Pac (I think Pac will be better)
    Quick vs Price (Price would have to be perfect to equal him)
    Doughty vs Subban (Subban can be as good)
    Scuderi vs Gorges (great comparison)
    Richards > Plecs
    Brown vs Prust (better comparison)
    Justin Williams vs Gallagher


    Interesting comparison. We've got some good blueline prospects coming up but I'm still worried about the forwards.
     
  23. Rosso Scuderia

    Rosso Scuderia Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2012
    Messages:
    9,345
    Likes Received:
    2,619
    Trophy Points:
    126
    A balanced team is a team with talented players and hard working grinders.
     
  24. NotProkofievian

    NotProkofievian Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    17,584
    Likes Received:
    10,515
    Trophy Points:
    166
    You need the individuals to step up and solve the really tough problems. Like in the 2010 playoffs when we ran into Philly. They cracked our system wide open, and we had no one to stand up and change the flow of the games. We were eliminated in 5 as a result.

    Essentially, philly put obstacles in front of our team that no one could solve, and all the scoring by committee, and team play wasn't going to change that. All the team-work was leading them to the same, wrong answer.

    That's why it's so important for us to have a player like Galchenyuk. When good plays simply won't do, you need a player who can make brilliant plays.

    However, you do need the support for such players. You need to have an entire team playing their part and buying into one coherent strategy. Superstars can be shut-down too. To me, neither are sufficient conditions for a cup winner. Both are necessary conditions, however.
     
  25. ECWHSWI

    ECWHSWI bought a MB jersey

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    25,982
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    Trophy Points:
    186
    that's pretty much it.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"