Independent Review Panel Report Released

BadgerBruce

Registered User
Aug 8, 2013
1,559
2,196
In early 2020, the Canadian Hockey League (the three major junior leagues in Canada) commissioned a 3rd-party, 100% independent panel to examine discrimination, harassment and abuse in major junior hockey, limited to just the most recent 4 year period (2017-2020). This panel is known by the acronym “IRP” (Independent Review Panel).

The members of the IRP were former New Brunswick Premier Camille Theriault; co-founder of the Respect Group, Sheldon Kennedy; and former police investigator and women’s hockey icon, Danielle Sauvageau. The hon. Mr. Theriault chaired the panel.

The IRP completed and gave the CHL its report 13 months ago, in December, 2020.

The CHL subsequently muzzled the IRP members, forbidding them to speak publicly about their findings, and did not make the report public until just a few days ago, when a judge in a harassment and abuse class action lawsuit against the CHL was on the verge of ordering production of the report. The gag order placed on IRP members remains.

What is in the Report? Here, word for word, are the first two sentences of the report’s “Findings” section:

“Off-ice misconduct, including bullying, harassment and discrimination, exists in the CHL. A systemic culture exists in the CHL that results in maltreatment becoming an embedded norm.”

How did the CHL officially respond to the “Findings” (there are 13) and concrete “Recommendations” (there are 13 of these, too) of an INDEPENDENT panel they paid for to “learn the unvarnished truth”?
Horribly and diabolically.

Rather than just releasing the IRP report and dealing with the consequences head on, the CHL instead hired hired lawyer Rachel Turnpenney from TurnPenney- Milne, LLP, a boutique downtown Toronto law firm that works exclusively in the area of workplace law, to quickly write ANOTHER report intended to undercut the IRP’s report. The CHL only gave Rachel TurnPenney 30 days to do this, but by God, she pulled it off! I don’t even want to know how much this cost the CHL.

And so last Friday the CHL released, via its website, a 145-page document they call “Update on Player Wellbeing.”

The package begins with 8 pages of self-congratulatory prose in which the CHL praises itself for developing policies and procedures they think are great, the TurnPenney report claims are great, and the IRP report subsequently tears to absolute shreds.

The package continues with, you guessed it, the 50-page Rachel TurnPenney report, a purchased piece of advocacy “research” that is just breathtakingly and wilfully blind and obfuscatory.

Only after scrolling through all of this bullshite will you FINALLY arrive at the Independent Review Panel’s report, entitled “The Impact is Real … Action is Needed.”

Here’s the CHL’s link to the package. My advice is to read it in reverse order — start with the IRP’s report, then the TurnPenney report, and end with the CHL’s shameless prologue.

https://cdn.chl.ca/uploads/chl/2022/01/21095713/PlayerWellbeingUpdate_FINAL.pdf
 

rangersblues

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
2,699
2,705
It's definitely Branch's modus operandi. Wait until a problem arises, do an investigation, bury the problem, then say they already had policies in place to prevent the problem but add some gobbleddeegoop to reinforce the policy. Pats on the back all-around. It's why he's paid the big bucks.

It's interesting in an alarming way that only about 20% of coaches and GMs think Bullying, Harrassment and Discrimination are a problem. Almost 50% more (30% total) of the players admit these are problems. Yet over 40% of parents (twice the amount of coaches and GMs) say it's a problem. I would assume the parents perspective is derived from hearing their kids speak about these things, but still the kids are reluctant or unable to acknowledge what is happening.
 

Buttsy

Registered User
Jul 28, 2015
2,706
2,312
London
It's definitely Branch's modus operandi. Wait until a problem arises, do an investigation, bury the problem, then say they already had policies in place to prevent the problem but add some gobbleddeegoop to reinforce the policy. Pats on the back all-around. It's why he's paid the big bucks.

It's interesting in an alarming way that only about 20% of coaches and GMs think Bullying, Harrassment and Discrimination are a problem. Almost 50% more (30% total) of the players admit these are problems. Yet over 40% of parents (twice the amount of coaches and GMs) say it's a problem. I would assume the parents perspective is derived from hearing their kids speak about these things, but still the kids are reluctant or unable to acknowledge what is happening.
The reluctance of the kids to report the issues I think supports the percentages? However as Coaches and GMs you certainly should be able to appreciate that if you hear of 1 case there is probably at least 2 more unreported?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangersblues

BadgerBruce

Registered User
Aug 8, 2013
1,559
2,196
The Independent Report is pretty clear that THE most significant problem is the pervasive, ingrained culture of silence that prevents people from speaking up.

This is reinforced by information found the “Respondents Profile” section of the Leger surveys contained at the end of the report.

Only 31 of 60 CHL General Managers even bothered to complete the survey. So 29 didn’t.

That, by definition, is the “pervasive, ingrained culture of silence” the Report identifies.
 

BadgerBruce

Registered User
Aug 8, 2013
1,559
2,196
UPDATE:

A TSN story by Rick Westhead dealing with another court action against the CHL deals specifically with the Independent Report and the barriers the CHL put in place.


There are many elements of the story that are deeply disturbing, and picking out just one is difficult. But perhaps the most horrifying is the June 2022 legal deposition from Dave Lorentz:

"Lorentz, a high school principal and Peterborough Petes board member, testified about playing for the Petes from 1987-1990 and his experience as a rookie participating in an “initiation” called “the hot box.”

Lorentz testified that he and three or four other rookie players were asked by their older teammates to strip naked and get into the bathroom at the back of the team bus during a road trip at the beginning of the season."”

Lorentz testified that while he wouldn’t have had a problem with his son participating in the hot box with an OHL team, he would not allow teachers at his high school to direct new students to do it.
“High school students aren’t naked with the same players,” he said. “They’re not on a team that they are naked with them 30 per cent of the time, three times a day sometimes.”


Oh my. And this man was fully prepped before his deposition.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad