Would a fully independent double-A league (as in same level of play then the ECHL) work?
Seeing as how IHL and the CHL have both gone under in recent years it seems that it does not work.
The CHL and IHL were not the same level of play as the ECHL - not even close.
The CHL and IHL were not the same level of play as the ECHL - not even close.
Guess that is why the Allen Americans won the ECHL last year after coming over from the CHL?
Guess that is why the Allen Americans won the ECHL last year after coming over from the CHL?
Its not like the echl has always been in the affiliate game.
Affiliations are nothing but something to sell the casual fan with the line of "come srr future stars of so and so"
Guess that is why the Allen Americans won the ECHL last year after coming over from the CHL?
But I suspect that the ECHL getting more into it is what helped their staying power. Even though we know the affiliations are so-so at best, it answers the question to several people "why am I watching this?" Also, they picked up a few markets along the way.
While I just addressed affiliations, your mention of "casual fan" merits a response. How many people- sold on the "family entertainment aspect" of this gig- want to deal with the old prototypical "fight fan?"
This is always a weak argument. At the AA level and below, you're dealing with 1-year contracts usually. You're not going to see the same roster year to year even if you stay in the same league. League's like the UHL/IHL and the CHL you'd have more hold over than in the ECHL but you'd also see a ton of change.
And how many of their CHL players held over, especially the ones on CHL contracts? How many more players did they have assigned from the AHL this year?
Winning sells though no matter the product or league but the rare market. Winning is essential.