I think Sundin gets an "ever the slightest edge" because his peak was sustained longer than Alfie's, but yeah, pretty equivalent otherwise.
I think Alfie gets in. I think my whole point with the examples I brought up is that the HHOF is unpredictable and unreliable as far as making the right choices at the right times, so to assume Alfie is a first-ballot guys is jumping the gun.
If there had been two likely HHOF's among the 2016 class and another two for the 2017 class, I'd have been a lot less optimistic. But there's Jack All this year, so the voters can use it to clear backlog. The guys who get left off after this year probably have a pretty slim chance of ever getting in. There won't be much of a backlog left for 2017.
Even better for Alfredsson is just the way that 2017 class looks.
Selanne..... Alfredsson...... R. Smyth, T.Thomas, R. Whitney, S. Koivu, JS Giguere, E. Jovanovski, T. Kaberle, T. Vokoun, etc
I think that voters are going to draw lines in the sand where I did. When they see those players, it will look obvious that Alfredsson is getting in one day. But after clearing the deck in 2016, Alfie could just be lucky that it's clear sailing on his first try.
OK, let's start...
- Both Andreychuck and Mogilny have more goals and more goals-per-game than Alfredsson.
- Andreychuck has eight 30 goal seasons, two 40 goal seasons, and a 50 goal season.
- Mogilny has eight 30 goal seasons, three 40 goal seasons, two 50 goal seasons, and one ungodly 76 goal season.
- Mogilny has higher PPG. Anderson has more points.
Because they played significant time in an easy era to score in.
When they're era adjusted, Andreychuk is nowhere near Alfredsson offensively. Alfredsson destroys him in points and PPG. Andreychuk's goalscoring rate is slightly ahead, but not particularly impressive compared to Alfredsson considering the fact that Andreychuk had no other use on the ice except to score goals. Meanwhile, Alfredsson did everything on the ice except play goalie.
You might think that the old school guys are easily fooled by the high scoring 1980's, but they were also around back then to watch Andreychuk in his prime. He was a 1-dimensional, cherry picker who scored goals when it was easy to score while getting lots of ice time on terrible teams. Maybe some of them ask themselves if they could've won if he was their best or 2nd best forward.
Andreychuk finished Top-10 in G (2), Pts (1), PPG a total of 3 times.
Never finished Top-10 for a Trophy. Never finished on a AS Team.
Alfredsson finished Top-10 in G (3), Pts (3), PPG (3) a total of 9 times.
Won the Calder, Clancy and Messier. 2nd AS Team. Alfredsson destroyed both Andreychuk and Mogilny in Trophy voting throughout their careers.
Andreychuk was never anywhere near the offensive or defensive player that Alfredsson was, not even close. Andreychuk actually adjusts to 11 points fewer than Alfredsson in 400 more career games.
Mogilny is at least the same class of offensive player.
Mogilny has the two big goalscoring seasons, but his production dropped off otherwise due to injury and inconsistency. He doesn't have nearly as many productive seasons as Alfredsson and Alfie was much better defensively too. Mogilny just doesn't have a high enough peak to contend with Alfredsson's consistency or all round game.
Re: Mogilny's PPG... his career effectively ended at 34yo and he played 5 years before the DPE ever started. His unadjusted PPG is 1.04 at 990 games (38% of those games pre-dead puck). Alfredsson rolled back to 1002 games is at 0.99 PPG (100% of those games played after the start of the DPE). Era-adjusted, it's 1.09 Alfie to Mogilny's 1.06.
- Both Andreychuck and Mogilny have Cups, Alfie doesn't.
They had fewer points combined in their Stanley Cup winning postseasons than Alfredsson posted in his SCF's season.
I think that the voters have adjusted quite well to the bigger league / less chance at a Cup (Sundin, Oates, Housley, etc). The Cup is a nice cap to your career, but it's not the be all and end all.
This should also be where we point out that neither of Andreychuk or Mogilny produced as well as Alfredsson did in the playoffs... which really sucks because 1/3 of Mogilny's and well over 1/2 of Andreychuk's playoff games occurred between 1980-1995. They should have posted video game totals, not less than a player whose career started at the beginning of the DPE.
Those are all metrics in which both Mogilny and Andreychuck were better. Now, there's a lot of context missing there, but quite frankly, the HHOF often ignores context. This is my point in asking "By what metric is Alfredsson better", because while you and I can make a very good case that Alfredsson was better than both, this is the same institution that elected Dick Duff and Clark Gillies into the HHOF, so you know their view of context is at best handicapped. They look at total goals. They look at longevity. They look at "Cup Wins". They look at team achievements despite the fact that it's an individual recognition. They look at guys on winning teams/dynasties more than they look at guys on smaller market teams. They look at guys who got more press.
The admission for the HHOF is flawed, and as long as it is, there are definitely metrics that, even though you and I don't agree with them, will get Andreychuck and/or Mogilny into the HHOF before Alfredson... especially if there is a sympathy campaign out in the general public that these players have been "snubbed" in the past.
I think it's quite the opposite with those two players, there's a vocal crowd who believes that they should never get in. Andreychuk has some backers, I don't think Mogilny has any.