What would Sidney Crosby's stats look like if he started today?
I'm sorry, but I just don't think he'd make it. I know many of you regard him and Ovechkin as HHOF locks, but the game has changed in the time he's been gone.
The Penguins are 7-3-1 since he left, so they clearly adapted to the New New New NHL. Sid had a good shot and skated okay in 2010, but this is 2011 now.
That 25 game point streak would be about 14 games long AT MOST. The 11 Pens games since he left have 48 total goals, or just under 4.5. Scoring by both the Pens and their opponents are WAY down from the 5.4 or so goals per game from fall/winter 2010.
I thought Sid was okay in his day, but the times have changed.
It's a different league. It's a new era. It's February.
...
He would rip this league a new one.
Every change the game has gone through since his prime, big and small, has been in favor of his style.
Goalkeeper equipment?
82 games... 15 goals, 28 assists.
He would be merely average. Wait, that's just what I've learned from these boards over the course of the last few days.
He would rip this league a new one.
Every change the game has gone through since his prime, big and small, has been in favor of his style.
No red line, no more obstruction, no more clutching and grabbing, the game favors the highly skilled more than ever before. He'd be the most unstoppable player we have ever seen.
If he was 23-30 years old , he would easily win the scoring title by 50-70 points considering he would without a doubt score 160-180 points ( the average art ross winner is about 110pts ), and would destroy the league's second best powerplay performer ( which would invariably be on his team thanks to him ) Goalies equipment are not a factor with Lemieux , the guy is the best player the game ever saw when facing a goaltender with his flair & reach.He rarely missed.The guy was the best breakaway player ever , and sinceh e was also the best 1 on 1 player he was often in a breakaway ( not to mention the cherry picking , which is worth it with Lemieux , and would tremendously get better with no red line ) Lemieux also was big and strong and almost impossible to make him lose the puck so the average size ofthe NHL player don't matter.He's also the 2nd most gifted playmaker ever.Wuinning scoring title and making a point of his domination was also something that was deep in the character of the human.Everybody knows the guy was not a humble person and so what? He's entitled to think highly of himself if it make him won scoring title by ridiculous margin ( especially excluding Gretzky ).If Mario Lemieux was playing , despite what the young kids think , every night you would listen to the sport news and see him rack up 2 pts games every night and sometimes a big explosion of 4 ,5 ,6 points with a couple of disapointing 1 pts games.
First of all paragraphs are your friend. I agree he would put up 2 points a game most nights, but with only 60 or so games played he wouldn't be running away with any scoring championships. If we are going to pretend that he would never get hurt, can we also pretend that Gretzky is 6 foot 4 and 225lbs?
He would rip this league a new one.
Every change the game has gone through since his prime, big and small, has been in favor of his style.
No red line, no more obstruction, no more clutching and grabbing, the game favors the highly skilled more than ever before. He'd be the most unstoppable player we have ever seen.
The only debate here is exactly how thoroughly Lemieux would dominate, not whether or not it would happen. Lemieux put up big numbers in the height of the dead-puck/Garth Snow chest-pad era with failing health. In todays fast-flowing game, and especially if we give him his health in this fantasy scenario, Lemieux would be huge. I say a minimum of 160 or more points per season for several consecutive seasons.
Complete fantasy, he would miss just as much time if not more than he did in the 80's-90's.
His points per game would be somewhere around 1.6-2.1, but I doubt he would play more than 60 games most seasons