If a Team Loses the Play-In Round, is it Fair to Say they Missed the Playoffs?

If a team loses the play-in round, is it fair to say they missed the playoffs?


  • Total voters
    162

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
I can already imagine some of the semantic arguments that will take place here over whether or not a certain team “missed the playoffs” if they lose in the play-in round, so I think it would be good to take a stance on this right now, before we learn the fate of the teams we like and dislike, and then decide to determine the “right” way of looking at things based on our personal biases.

Some things to consider:

- Every team that loses the play-in round will be eligible for the draft lottery
- NHL teams seem pretty determined to refer to this play-in round as the playoffs
- Unlike teams, the NHL itself seems pretty determined not to refer to this play-in round as the playoffs

Where do you stand? If a team loses the play-in round, do you think it’s fair to say they “missed the playoffs”?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VoluntaryDom

Krewe

Registered User
Mar 12, 2019
1,676
1,917
If they were going to make the 16 team format, no they didn’t miss in my book. If they were out of the playoffs and then lose the play in round then yeah I would say they missed. Teams like Edmonton, Toronto, Pittsburgh made it in my book
 

mouz135

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
1,966
2,113
Of course it’s fair. They didn’t win their bo5 play in series and therefore didn’t qualify for the playoffs, hence they missed the playoffs. The poll speaks for itself. It’s not rocket science, people
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoutineSp00nZ

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,335
15,055
Was thinking about that in relation to Pittsburgh specifically the other day.

Imagine habs beat them.

1. They have the longest active playoff streak in the league, 13 years. Is this now ended?

2. They were the safest of the 'play-in' teams in regards to playoff odds.

Would be a crappy way for their streak to end.
 

JuneauRiley05

Registered User
Feb 12, 2020
105
65
Was thinking about that in relation to Pittsburgh specifically the other day.

Imagine habs beat them.

1. They have the longest active playoff streak in the league, 13 years. Is this now ended?

2. They were the safest of the 'play-in' teams in regards to playoff odds.

Would be a crappy way for their streak to end.
I have a question for you hab fans. Do you even want them to win ? If I was a hab fan I’d want to be in the lottery way more than winning a stupid play in round only to get bounced early in the playoffs and miss the lottery. They need high end players.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,744
29,443
Of course it’s fair. They didn’t win their bo5 play in series and therefore didn’t qualify for the playoffs, hence they missed the playoffs. The poll speaks for itself. It’s not rocket science, people

The league isn't counting the "play-in" round as playoffs for the purposes of trade conditions and bonuses but that's merely a technicality. It is literally a playoff round. Two teams, win and advance to the next round or lose and go home. That's what a playoff series is.
 

mouz135

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
1,966
2,113
The league isn't counting the "play-in" round as playoffs for the purposes of trade conditions and bonuses but that's merely a technicality. It is literally a playoff round. Two teams, win and advance to the next round or lose and go home. That's what a playoff series is.
I don’t think anyone is considering it part of the 16 team playoffs. The poll would back that up
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,335
15,055
I have a question for you hab fans. Do you even want them to win ? If I was a hab fan I’d want to be in the lottery way more than winning a stupid play in round only to get bounced early in the playoffs and miss the lottery. They need high end players.

Most habs fans on HF want the team to lose to protect draft odds - in fact most are upset because this play-in lowers our odds at the lottery, even if we do lose.

My own answer is a bit more complicated. I hate losing/tanking - so if we're in the playoffs I want to go for it, even against strong odds - and try to win the cup. But - if it's not for the Habs - my second favorite choice to win would be Pittsburgh, who has a much more realistic chance to win the cup. So I have mixed feelings...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JuneauRiley05

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,791
4,635
Michigan
I’d say they missed. It’s a play in to make the playoffs. You can argue whether it’s fair for a team like Pitts that was almost guaranteed to make it, but you can’t really argue it not being playoff rounds as they’ve already said this.
 

JuneauRiley05

Registered User
Feb 12, 2020
105
65
Most habs fans on HF want the team to lose to protect draft odds - in fact most are upset because this play-in lowers our odds at the lottery, even if we do lose.

My own answer is a bit more complicated. I hate losing/tanking - so if we're in the playoffs I want to go for it, even against strong odds - and try to win the cup. But - if it's not for the Habs - my second favorite choice to win would be Pittsburgh, who has a much more realistic chance to win the cup. So I have mixed feelings...
That’s the one silver lining for any team who gets upset in the play in round. They go to the draft lottery
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,744
29,443
I don’t think anyone is considering it part of the 16 team playoffs. The poll would back that up

16 team playoffs? Of course not, there's 24 teams. But that just makes it a pre "16 team playoff" "playoff round". If you have two teams playing in a win or go home scenario it's a playoff round, literally.
 

DirtDiver

Registered User
Aug 14, 2017
642
490
Canada
16 team playoffs? Of course not, there's 24 teams. But that just makes it a pre "16 team playoff" "playoff round". If you have two teams playing in a win or go home scenario it's a playoff round, literally.

A playoff round is literally what the NHL says is a playoff round not what some fan on a message board says it is. Sorry to break your heart. I didnt make these rules the NHL did. Is round robin a playoff game to you?
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
24,998
14,391
Vancouver
16 team playoffs? Of course not, there's 24 teams. But that just makes it a pre "16 team playoff" "playoff round". If you have two teams playing in a win or go home scenario it's a playoff round, literally.

The league has rules for a tiebreaker game if two teams are tied for the final playoff spot in points and all the tiebreaker statistics. It wouldn't be called the playoffs either. Baseball has had it happen several times and they actually add the game to the regular season stats
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,744
29,443
A playoff round is literally what the NHL says is a playoff round not what some fan on a message board. Sorry to break your heart. I didnt make these rules the NHL did. Is round robin a playoff game to you?

The word "playoff" has a meaning the world round. It's in use for sports leagues everywhere, even in non English language contexts. And I don't think round robin formats are considered playoffs anywhere, could be wrong though.

Why would you think my heart is broken by what you think? Nice of you to be sorry but no need.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
If they were going to make the 16 team format, no they didn’t miss in my book. If they were out of the playoffs and then lose the play in round then yeah I would say they missed. Teams like Edmonton, Toronto, Pittsburgh made it in my book

Pittsburgh I can understand, they were literally 7th in the league by P%.

Toronto? That's a much tougher one. It is conceivable that if they lose to Columbus and Florida wins against NYI, the sum of all games played up to that point would have them out of a playoff spot by P%, even if we don't place any additional weight on play-in games. If that is the case, then is it fair to say they missed?

An easier way to look at this is Calgary and Winnipeg. By P%, Calgary is in the playoffs by at .564, while Winnipeg is out at .563. What if Winnipeg beats Calgary in the first round? Then they'll have a higher P% than Calgary in the sum of all games, and Calgary will be out of a playoff spot both by P% over all games played, and by losing in the first round. Do they still count as a playoff team because they just barely made it in the top-8 at the random cutoff point?
 

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,047
2,930
Waterloo, ON
Was thinking about that in relation to Pittsburgh specifically the other day.

Imagine habs beat them.

1. They have the longest active playoff streak in the league, 13 years. Is this now ended?

2. They were the safest of the 'play-in' teams in regards to playoff odds.

Would be a crappy way for their streak to end.

Streaks like that can occasionally be fun to talk about, but do they really mean anything? A few fans might care, but I honestly doubt that anyone with Penguins other than their PR folks care.

Note that I am talking about them caring about the streak. I definitely think the Penguins care about winning the play-in series.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobholly39

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,335
15,055
Streaks like that can occasionally be fun to talk about, but do they really mean anything? A few fans might care, but I honestly doubt that anyone with Penguins other than their PR folks care.

Note that I am talking about them caring about the streak. I definitely think the Penguins care about winning the play-in series.

You're right - in the end that streak means very little. They have 3 cups to show for in that stretch and want more, and that's more important than making the playoffs. Who cares if they make it 15x in a row or miss once or twice - all they care is if they win the cup or not in a given year I'm sure.

For what it's worth - despite me saying it would suck for them to lose their streak, I'm actually a big supporter of the play-in format. The league did it right. 24 teams is maybe a bit much and maybe 20 would have been enough, but it doesn't make a big difference.

And if Pittsburgh does lose to Montreal and is therefore eliminated from the official playoffs - they'd look like the biggest jokes in the world to say "it's not fair, Montreal wasn't supposed to be in!". If Montreal wasn't in - they'd play Philly in the first round - isn't that way harder? This is true for all play-in series imo. I hope losers lose with dignity
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,826
11,145
Yes they missed the playoffs, otherwise they wouldn’t be eligible for the draft lottery.
 

KoozNetsOff 92

Hala Madrid
Apr 6, 2016
8,567
8,229
The playoffs are 16 teams. So if you lose in the play in round, you aren't 1 of those 16 teams so you aren't in the playoffs.
 

VoluntaryDom

Formerly DominicBoltsFan / Ⓐ / ✞
Oct 31, 2016
23,285
5,532
Tampa FL
yes, it's basically just a way to speed up the end of the regular season and to bubble teams. The NHL is very clear these are not playoff games. Granted, I don't think I would harshly criticize a team for losing a best 3 of 5 series. Nor would I consider it the same as missing the playoffs in a normal season
this is the correct answer
 

Dr Salt

Bedard saved me
Feb 26, 2019
1,617
890
ym
I think for some teams it will feel unfair for them to have missed it but its not doing them an injustice to say they missed it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad