Stony Curtis
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2018
- 1,184
- 1,941
I rarely post, but I've been reading some of the reactions to the Ryan and Merrill signings, and I wanted to add something. I get why some aren't happy, but I really don't see a downside.
Pretty much all coaches will tell you that ice time is an important motivational tool, maybe THE most important tool now that douchebag coaches are being outed. Most good teams have a few players who will give 100% regardless, but the rest need something more to bring out their best. That's usually ice time. Theoretically, more IT might = better stats. Better stats might = more $. More $ + increased role might = a happier player. A win for everyone.
Unfortunately, the Wings aren't close to having the level of talent necessary for that. Therefore, I think Yzerman's strategy to sign players like Ryan and Merrill to cost-effective contracts is a good one. As some have pointed out, they're (marginally, at least) better players than most of what we have now, but, IMHO, not so much better that younger players have no hope of an increased role. If one of our youngsters can't beat out Ryan or Merrill, then how good are they REALLY? I think it's pissing on the pyramids, team culture-wise, to be handing out playing time without it being earned.
But I'm kinda stupid and wrong a lot, too, lol. Thoughts?
Pretty much all coaches will tell you that ice time is an important motivational tool, maybe THE most important tool now that douchebag coaches are being outed. Most good teams have a few players who will give 100% regardless, but the rest need something more to bring out their best. That's usually ice time. Theoretically, more IT might = better stats. Better stats might = more $. More $ + increased role might = a happier player. A win for everyone.
Unfortunately, the Wings aren't close to having the level of talent necessary for that. Therefore, I think Yzerman's strategy to sign players like Ryan and Merrill to cost-effective contracts is a good one. As some have pointed out, they're (marginally, at least) better players than most of what we have now, but, IMHO, not so much better that younger players have no hope of an increased role. If one of our youngsters can't beat out Ryan or Merrill, then how good are they REALLY? I think it's pissing on the pyramids, team culture-wise, to be handing out playing time without it being earned.
But I'm kinda stupid and wrong a lot, too, lol. Thoughts?