Tawnos
A guy with a bass
...the owners can claim that salaries will rise at the same rate as they did in the past under the old CBA. Can anyone explain that to me?
Tawnos said:...the owners can claim that salaries will rise at the same rate as they did in the past under the old CBA. Can anyone explain that to me?
Tawnos said:...the owners can claim that salaries will rise at the same rate as they did in the past under the old CBA. Can anyone explain that to me?
Tawnos said:...the owners can claim that salaries will rise at the same rate as they did in the past under the old CBA. Can anyone explain that to me?
Newsguyone said:SO while owners showed us they can cut back without a salary cap, they apparently believe they can only control themselves with a cap, or the threat of a salary cap.
I in the Eye said:Perhaps the solution then is to constantly threaten that there will be a hard salary cap, without actually having to implement it...
x-bob said:Well....you can't stop the salaries rising with just a roolback. That would be just hiding the problem for 2-3 years. The players are just gonna ask for more money and as usuall, they are gonna get it because there are always gonna be some GMs who are gonna ruin everything for everyone just to win.
Newsguyone said:A 24 percent rebate in a three year deal is actually such a threat.
copperandblue said:Wouldn't a 24% rebate in year three actually be an incentive to spend?
Because if you are going to go this far in CBA negotiations then imagine if you put the fans through this enterprise again.Newsguyone said:Then why not sign a 3-year CBA.
And deal with it again in three years.
Seriously. Who knows what damage has been done to the sport already.
Newsguyone said:Then why not sign a 3-year CBA.
And deal with it again in three years.
Seriously. Who knows what damage has been done to the sport already.