Jim Bob
RIP RJ
It's cool that they actually let him talk!
A: When I was hired seven years ago that was one of the mandates, to build an infrastructure here. Obviously it’s something where you need to have more than one person on it. We’ve been really lucky to have some really great engineering schools in the area and we’ve had up to five engineering students that have worked with us to build our database tools, some of our analytic tools, some of our reporting tools and I’ve also had an assistant (Mae Sementilli) that’s going back to get her Ph.D., but she’s worked here for the past five years. Very talented engineer. I think we’re looking at staffing right now, but what I would say that our priority is on technical training and it’s because of the volume of data. And the ability to make sure we’re not dealing with noise. We’re capturing strong signals relative to player evaluation and we’re passing that along to the coaches and management.
Hockey Data Analytics Graduate Assistant
Company Name
Buffalo Sabres
Dates EmployedJun 2014 – Present
Employment Duration6 yrs 2 mos
- Creating and managing databases using Matlab, Python, MySQL
- Data mining in Matlab and Python
- Developing and managing applications written in Python
So besides JN, the only people working on data modeling where UB undergrad students? Probably for $15/hr. I was a UB engineering student myself once upon a time, I can't imagine being all that helpful at that age.
When you read this and really start to appreciate the thought process here... and then immediately think about how they've deployed Risto
Feels like it’s not exactly a coincidence that this is the first time we’re hearing from Nightingale.
Nothing there about how they have used analytics, it's all about how they plan to use analytics.
Huh? He talks plenty about how they have used analytics in the past. The main reason they focus on the future more here is because there's a big change in player tracking and data coming next season, so there would've been changes in that regard even if Botts was still here.
Over the next six years, Nightingale built an infrastructure that provided Sabres management and coaches with data that could drive decision-making.
A: I think the amount of data – someone used the analogy of watching a game on black-and-white versus color. For example, typically what we had in the past is just shot attempts. Many of the initial data points were driven by shots.
My feel is that he might have been able to scale his department, but his output only factored into decision making when it confirmed front office/coaching bias.He said he was given a larger role in 2017...nothing has improved since then - on the pro side, at least. Maybe they've only been applying his work to the amateur scouting?
Not really.
Those are the only references to how data has been used in the past, and there is nothing there.
He's talking about how they built it, not if or how it was used by the coach or GM. It's the old "you can lead a horse to water" bit."A: When I was hired seven years ago that was one of the mandates, to build an infrastructure here. Obviously it’s something where you need to have more than one person on it. We’ve been really lucky to have some really great engineering schools in the area and we’ve had up to five engineering students that have worked with us to build our database tools, some of our analytic tools, some of our reporting tools and I’ve also had an assistant (Mae Sementilli) that’s going back to get her Ph.D., but she’s worked here for the past five years. Very talented engineer. I think we’re looking at staffing right now, but what I would say that our priority is on technical training and it’s because of the volume of data. And the ability to make sure we’re not dealing with noise. We’re capturing strong signals relative to player evaluation and we’re passing that along to the coaches and management."
When you read this and really start to appreciate the thought process here... and then immediately think about how they've deployed Risto
To me, it’s imperative on the analyst to earn trust with the hockey staff and to be able to put forward useful information that is predictive of success and repeatable.
“Data and data accessories.”
Which of their acquisitions were Montour style micro-stats adds? Most of their mistakes had more to do with misreading aging curves for players that had good underlying numbers, and Chayka’s initial mandate to build around fraudulent assets in OEL/Strome.Regarding player tracking and the information gathered there, some argue that could be what got the coyotes into trouble. That the focus became more on the micro, than macro and lost value because there is a lot more noise. That said, the following quote is reassuring. As obvious as it sounds, its so important to not get lost in data for the sake of data but using what has predictive value.