alecfromtherock
Registered User
- Feb 2, 2004
- 507
- 0
As it relates to the 54% NHL cap argument.
Lets say $900 million.
$3 billion X 54% Vs $2.1 billion X 54% is an increase of 42.8%
$32 million cap X 1.428 = $47,424,000
$48 million would cover 19/30(63%) teams based on last years salaries.
$22 million was the lowest salary last season, there is still a large gap of $20-$26(2X) for the lowest teams in terms of salary.
$48 ceiling - $15 Million ceiling/floor difference = $33 million (up to a 50% salary increase for the lowest salary teams, unreasonable/attainable)
$40 million cap with a $15 million ceiling/floor = $25 million floor
Your thoughts
Lets say $900 million.
$3 billion X 54% Vs $2.1 billion X 54% is an increase of 42.8%
$32 million cap X 1.428 = $47,424,000
$48 million would cover 19/30(63%) teams based on last years salaries.
$22 million was the lowest salary last season, there is still a large gap of $20-$26(2X) for the lowest teams in terms of salary.
$48 ceiling - $15 Million ceiling/floor difference = $33 million (up to a 50% salary increase for the lowest salary teams, unreasonable/attainable)
$40 million cap with a $15 million ceiling/floor = $25 million floor
Your thoughts