Same here.
theguru, that's not true at all. As mentioned before, it's the technique that matters, not brute strength. Plus I see the bottom hand as more of a pivot point more than the source of the power.
And Kings, I've seen plenty of people say (people as well as articles) that Canada is about 70% left-handed in hockey while the US is about 70% right-handed. Seems to me that since hockey is rarely a first sport for anyone in the States, everyone seems to think you play the same as other swinging sports (namely baseball and golf). Once you play for a short while I doubt it matters, you'll be just as good either way with practice.
i find that sort of stuff really interesting...
as i'm a right-handed person (do everything right-handed, throw a football/baseball, write, golf, etc.) and yet i also shoot right n hockey.
i'm canadian, born and raised. and my father is also canadian, right-handed, and played a lot of hockey in his youth and shoots left (as most would expect). he's the one who was responsible for my early introduction to hockey and which hand i ended up shooting i guess?
but i feel like there's more to it...bear with me...
my mother is american, from florida. where according to the 'results', the 'handedness' is reversed. of course, my mother being from florida...had almost nothing appreciable to do with my hockey development. so...seems stupid.
but the other thing...
is that my mother is also left-handed. as is my sister, and my grandmother.
and to basically ruin my case...i spent most of my years in hockey as a goaltender, playing as a natural, normal, full-left goaltender. glove on the left hand, blocker on the right.
i also do a few other random odd tasks left-handed apparently, without noticing, until people point it out. but basically right-handed for everything important.
makes me very curious about the whole thing though. always kinda wonder if i should be shooting left after all...but it just seems so unnatural to me.