Steven Toast
Registered User
I voted "probably not as happy" because I doubt large gatherings will be able to happen. Still very happy, but not quite on the level of any other year.
Ha i thought about adding it but that is just not truthful, there is no way someone is going to be happier with a cup this year than another year unless that year was a lockout 1/2 season or somethingNeeds the option: More happy than another year
Super happy, and anyone who claims otherwise is lying. None of this is ideal, but we're all under the same rules, so whoever wins, deserves it.
I think the only scenario where you might put an asterisk on it is if the team that won was effectively out of the playoff hunt and got in because of the change, otherwise it's a small enough difference that I wouldn't worry about it
montreal,chicago,zona..maybe minny.
20 teams would have been ideal and not seemed like a cash grab. chicago and montreal being 23 and 24 and cash cows makes it sketch
Couldn't disagree more with this but only time will tell. Many still consider the 99 NBA championship tainted and that was just a shortened season.Of course they will.
If Leafs win - 10 years from now people will say "yeah, that Leafs cup drought is over"
If Caps win - 10 years from now people will say "Yeah, it took a while to overcome the bad luck with no past 2 rounds, but eventually Ovi won 2 in 3"
If Pens win - 10 years from now people will say "Yeah, remember when Pens won 3 in 5? Does 3 in 5 qualify as dynasty or not?"
If Rangers win, 10 years from now people will say "Yeah, i'm so happy Lundqvist finally won his cup, well deserved"
And so on.
Maybe in the moment some people will question this year's playoffs (as many on here already are). But 10 years removed - it will be remembered as a cup, as any other.
The Cup has been awarded under all kinds of circumstances. Some ideal, others not so much.
~Arbitrary challenge submissions - Pre NHL, and Cup challenges were accepted at the whim of the Stanley Cup Trustees.
~World War I - Many top players fighting overseas.
~World War II - Many top players fighting overseas.
~Six team league - Nobody but the “Original Six” allowed to compete for the Cup. Very unfair to many players and teams that might have been good enough had more competition been allowed.
~Twelve team league with one entire division made up of expansion teams - A total joke of a playoff format and to date the dumbest thing the NHL has ever done. And that’s saying something.
They all count. Each one as much as the next.
I would very much just like the playoffs to start using the standings as they are and go with the usual format in place. However, the NHL seems like it will use a different format this year, and the Stanley Cup Trustees will sign off on it.
If the Bruins win the Cup this year, I’ll remember the circumstances of the win, but I certainly won’t think less of it. Everyone’s all in the same boat, and all this certainly isn’t any fault of the Bruins. It is what it is.
If the Canucks win you’ll change your tune
ya that's basically what I'm seeing, if it's not one of those that wins then I have a hard time placing an asterisk even if the team that won gets an easier first and maybe 2nd round than they would otherwise have, they still have to go through 2-3 hard roundsmontreal,chicago,zona..maybe minny.
20 teams would have been ideal and not seemed like a cash grab. chicago and montreal being 23 and 24 and cash cows makes it sketch