I had very high hopes for both Wennberg and Lindholm during the middle of the season but since then my high hopes has fallen down a notch or two. Lindholm has a problem with his work-ethic off the ice much like Calle Järnkrok. He laughs behind the backs of people who says that he needs to develop more strength and gain some weight. He thinks that idea is silly, and that's kind of silly of him to think so because he would definately benefit by adding some muscle to his frame.
While Wennberg doesn't have such problems he is obviously much more dependant on his environment. He's great at positioning himself but lacks the ability to create a lot of own opportunities. That's always a con for me. However he's still a very good player who should be one of the first 20 picks.
I think that Burakovsky developed a lot during this season. My first viewing of him got me disappointed. He had so much raw skill but weren't able to make use of it in a proper way. He was selfish and very easy to read. So when I had my last viewing on him a couple of months ago I was amazed over his development. Sure, there are still some untamed raw skill but his patterns were no longer as visible as before. With the right schooling this guy will has more upside to him compared to a guy like Wennberg.
I've noticed that a lot of americans hold both de la Rose and Hägg much higher than my Swedish colleagues. I don't know exactly why but I feel that it's because they like de la Rose's "Canadian playstyle" a lot and only have seen Hägg play in international games. I, however, have watched them play in both their regular team and their junior team and think there is a big difference between their international display and regional display. To begin with de la Rose is a very limited player which shouldn't be praised that high. Sure, he plays a north and south kind of game and succeeds at doing so, but in order for him to rack up points at a decent level he will be needing to have more skilled teammates donate it to him.
I would love to give my thoughts about Hägg as well but I'm afraid I have no time for that right now so I'll do that at a later time, if anyone is interested.
My top-5:
Lindholm
Wennberg
Burakovsky
Hägg
de la Rose