Is it a Kaapo Kakko type situation where his defensive and possession game was so good he was worth keeping despite offensive underperformance? Did the Stars just never give up on him until the worst time?
He was a top 10 draft pick.
He was(is) big.
He was cheap.
He played 200 games, indicating he was at least a competent NHL player.
First round picks who get their foot in the door will often get 2nd, 3rd, sometimes 4th chances at sticking with a NHL club. Especially if they're big and especially if they're cheap. The Ritchie brothers are still floating around somewhere. Paajarvi played 10 seasons in the NHL despite never cracking 20pts after his rookie year.
What are you talking about? Nichushkin's first 2 seasons were fine. His third season was bad, after which he was not "kept" - he was traded.Is it a Kaapo Kakko type situation where his defensive and possession game was so good he was worth keeping despite offensive underperformance? Did the Stars just never give up on him until the worst time?
What are you talking about? Nichushkin's first 2 seasons were fine. His third season was bad, after which he was not "kept" - he was traded.
Of course, he was in KHL for some time as well but I'm not sure how much that comes into play.
The fact he PLAYED answers part of your questionIs it a Kaapo Kakko type situation where his defensive and possession game was so good he was worth keeping despite offensive underperformance? Did the Stars just never give up on him until the worst time?
Players who do not produce within 30 games are busts. Everyone on HFboards knows that.Three full seasons for a 10th overall pick, what's wrong with that?
Thanks; that was a pretty good interviewHere is a recent interview from Russia where he explains a bit about what happened in Dallas and why he's improved so much in Colorado: «Проиграли пятый матч финала — начал психовать. Казалось, упускаем кубок». Первое интервью Ничушкина после чемпионства в НХЛ
You'll need to translate it but you'll get the gist.
He was a top 10 draft pick.
He was(is) big.
He was cheap.
He played 200 games, indicating he was at least a competent NHL player.
First round picks who get their foot in the door will often get 2nd, 3rd, sometimes 4th chances at sticking with a NHL club. Especially if they're big and especially if they're cheap. The Ritchie brothers are still floating around somewhere. Paajarvi played 9 seasons in the NHL despite never cracking 20pts after his rookie year.
What was the caps system back then far was what D did? I guess I don’t remember well but I thought it had more to do with Trotz loving vets too much. Seemed guys like Gleason and Chorney got in over Schmidt too. Schmidt actually had great underlying numbers, but that was because he did all the little things well consistently and tilted the ice, but he didn’t pass Trotz “eye test” because his style obviously makes the same mistakes look worse than a stay at home guy, but Schmidt performed well I thought.Most guys who "suck" are playing for coaches that have rigid philosophies and are trying to fit square pegs into round holes instead of adopting their play styles to a player's talents.
The 17-18 Golden Knights team is a perfect example of it on both ends actually. They had a ton of players that were languishing away on other teams bottom pairings and bottom sixes that broke out for them - William Karlsson, Shea The adore, Nate Schmidt etc. but they also famously traded for Tomas Tatar, healthy scratched him and then traded him to the Habs the next year where he put up 30 goals.
Nate Schmidt in particular stands out as a player who was a victim of a rigid coach. He was a fast modern style two way defenceman that was a common sighting in the press box for the Caps for three years. Trotz didn't trust him over Brooks Orpik who was in the verge of retirement or Karl Alzner who was out of the league at 30. He goes to Vegas and becomes one of the important pieces of their Cup run.
When I heard stories that Barzal wasn't getting along with Trotz, I wasn't surprised. Barzal's career high in production still remains his rookie season and Trotz's system chokes the life out of players like Barzal offensively. He's a 90 point player at worst on a more offensive minded team.
Yeah. Big guys who at one point showed the skill to be a top pick like that, typically get a very long runway.
Though even then, Nichushkin's career very nearly didn't survive that early portion. He essentially washed out of the league for the KHL, and only came back on a bargain bin flyer "no risk" sort of contract. Which he made good on as a serviceable cheap player.