Theokritos
Global Moderator
- Apr 6, 2010
- 12,541
- 4,938
- Eligibility and Ranking Criteria
- Players should be ranked based on their overall accomplishments, including their time in the NHL (or WHA) if they played there. A "non-NHL player" is not to be understood as someone who didn't play in the NHL (or WHA) at all or whose resume there doesn't matter at all, but as a player who arguably spent the more significant part of his career outside of the NHL (or WHA).
- All eligible players are listed here.
- Players should be judged only on their accomplishments as hockey players.
- Eligible players who are still active should be ranked based only on what they have already done.
- Preliminary Discussion Thread
- Anyone may participate in this thread, even if he does not take part in the voting.
- Posters are encouraged to share information about players in this thread and to take information shared into account when constructing their own lists.
- Brief comparisons between players are permitted, but detailed cases and debates should be saved for Round 2 of voting.
- Please do not rank players outright in the preliminary thread. We don't want voters to just copy the lists or rankings of others.
- Voting
- Round 1
- All participants submit a list of 70 players ranked in order. This is mandatory if you want to be eligible for Round 2. Lists may be submitted via PM to Theokritos, starting on Sept 15.
Deadline is Sept 30.New deadline is October 7.Ballots will be accepted until the end of vote 1. Please PM Theokritos if you would like to participate and are unable to submit your list during this time frame. - All eras must be taken into consideration. There is some room for reasonable differences in weighting, but it's not acceptable to omit everybody who played in the 1950s or earlier, or to have only players from the 1980s and 1990s in your top 10.
- Likewise all significant hockey nations in Europe should be taken into consideration. Lists with a national bias beyond reasonable justification are not acceptable.
- The time frame for voting (both the date when we will start accepting lists and the voting deadline) will be posted here once it is determined.
- Players will be assigned a point value on the list based on ranking. A 1st place vote is worth 70 points, a 2nd place vote 69 points and so on down to 1 point for a 70th place vote.
- An aggregate list of the top players will be compiled ranking them in order of the most total points.
- All participants submit a list of 70 players ranked in order. This is mandatory if you want to be eligible for Round 2. Lists may be submitted via PM to Theokritos, starting on Sept 15.
- Round 2
- The top 8-10 ranked players from the aggregate list will be posted in a thread. This number will slowly increase up to 14 players as we get into later rounds.
- Players will be listed in alphabetical order to avoid creating bias.
- Player merits and rankings will be open for discussion and debate for a period of five days. Administrators may extend the discussion period if it remains active.
- Final voting will occur for two days, via PM.
- Participants rank their top 10 players every round. 1st place votes will be worth 10 points, 2nd place votes worth 9 points, etc.
- Ordinarily the top 4 vote getters will be added to the final list after each of the first five votes. However, if there are major breaks in the voting totals, we will add more or less than then 4 in certain rounds. After vote five we will ordinarily add 5 players per vote until the final list is complete.
- Tiebreak procedure: If two players are tied in voting points after a round, the higher ranking will go to the player who was ahead on a greater number of ballots. If they are still tied, it will remain a tie on the final list.
- Round 1
- Quality Assurance
- Lists will be subject to an evaluation process.
- The submitter of a questionable list will be given an opportunity to defend or justify any selection under question or to correct errors and resubmit.
- The complete voting record of every participant will be released at the end of the project.
- Participants Code of Conduct
- Participants must recognize that this is a collaborative project and that we all share the same goals, no matter how much we disagree on individual ranking.
- Participants should treat each other with respect and must not openly question the motivations of other participants.
- Repeatedly violating these rules may result in ban from this project and possibly similar future projects on the History of Hockey board.
Last edited: