Great it has potential to be a lottery pick, guess what ...... we cant trade the pick before we know what it is. What are you even talking about? If they are in window to be a lottery pick it will never be traded beforehand. Then we have the lottery and we know. Now if they move up to anywhere higher than 8-9 and still want Swayman here is no addl pcs necessary going to Bos. I'd say a top 5 pick and just keep it . Work another deal for another G. Its also a young talented player on a cheap ELC which will need sooner rather than later
Its not like we are trading a 1st and then suddenly it can become a top 3 pick lmao. See above, we all know that! Swayman is 25, he immediately solve s any goalie issues we have for the next 10+ years. Agreed but that doesnt mean give away more than you need to, thats my only point
Holtz is whatever, he scores but really does nothing else at a good enough level to be a top 6 winger. So the top 10 picked chosen for his lethal release to score is nothing more than that, got it. Cant believe I had to type that, but ok
Schmid has zero value at this point, is upset with the org as his agent has come out publicly and said. When we get another Goalie, Schmid will drop to 4th in our organizational depth chart. Zero need for him. I saw that too and if so include him in a trade. Again it does not have to all be in a Swayman trade, you give what you have to, not more. No G has gone for that return. KK is most likely going to be aFA, so he's out of eth picture. So its Daws, 1 year of Allen and Swayman. If Daws flounders next year like Schmid has then what?
Sure Id hate to lose Bahl, but it really isnt a massive lol. Hes been okay, but you need to move value to get value. I have Bahl going in a pkg for a better LHD. His size is useless if he doesnt use it. He was fine in the playoffs but that guy is gone. Too busy X checking guys in front instead of using his body. Go get a better version with him with adds from us.