AgainWow terrible value back for Murray. Dallas with some highway robbery.
Flames terminate the contract of Rick Nash
This trade is pending league review.MURRAY IN A HURRY
/
The San Jose Sharks made a splash on Tuesday night dealing concussion prone goaltender Matt Murray to the Dallas Stars in a trade deal that also saw forward Jordan Martinook make his way to Dallas. Coming the other way, the main piece in the deal was defenseman Conor Timmins, a defenseman who has also seen his fair share of concussion problems. The promising defenseman may need a little time to catch up to speed and marinate in the AHL before being called up to the show. Goalie Anton Forsberg also comes the way of San Jose, a Swedish netminder who's shown some promise but has been struggling recently. Jamie McGinn is undergoing surgery and missing game time for a while, so he may just be a cap dump. San Jose also received two draft picks in the deal; Detroit's 2019 3rd and Boston's 2020 3rd. Murray may be out for a while, but the Stars are clearly looking towards the future with this deal, and with Martinook's hot start, he can fill in for some of their injured forwards.
To DAL: Matt Murray, Jordan Martinook
To SJ: Conor Timmins, Jamie McGinn, Anton Forsberg, 2020 BOS 2nd, 2019 DET 3rd
dislikeThis trade is pending league review.
He's not in the database yet but I'll backdate this when he is.Calling up Lammikko, Juho
easiest veto of the yearThis trade is pending league review.
Normally I would agree with this but the Werenski to Boston deal was vetoed.There’s no reason to veto any trade based on value.
If each GM negotiated and agreed to the trade in good faith, it should stand.
If there was collusion and/or ulterior motives, sure.
If there’s no evidence of that with the recent trade, I don’t see why vetoing it is a suggestion.
In general, I completely agree with this. However, I like to extend the veto power for new GMs who may not fully understand the difference between IRL value and fantasy value.There’s no reason to veto any trade based on value.
If each GM negotiated and agreed to the trade in good faith, it should stand.
If there was collusion and/or ulterior motives, sure.
If there’s no evidence of that with the recent trade, I don’t see why vetoing it is a suggestion.
(not trying to start something here, just pleading my case)Normally I would agree with this but the Werenski to Boston deal was vetoed.
Would be unfair to allow all trades based on that precedent....
Uhh(not trying to start something here, just pleading my case)
Why would Joe do this trade if he thought he was going to lose?
cmon man, you can't compare this deal to the Werenski trade..
Adam Larsson puts up 10 -20 pts per season
Meier is good for 35 fwd ish pts
Bear could end up with 20 pts in the NHL.
Werenski will be a 50 point scorer for 10 more years. That's roughly defenseman 500 points and he also scores a good amount of goals. Werenski is the YOUNGEST PLAYER in the trade. Drai said he didn't even know what the league was entirely about yet at that point.
TRADE:
To BOS: Zach Werenski
To EDM: Adam Larsson, Timo Meier, Ethan Bear
You would've destroyed the trade then, now, and 10 years later, plus Drai didn't even know what was going on, and Joe has alreayd made several solid trades and knows the game.
Matt Murray has severe risk attached, there's a chance he may never play again, even if that chance isn't 50/50, it's still a chance.
Timmins isn't an asset to sneeze at as people have been suggesting. He's already going to play in the NHL this year at 20 years old and has the potential to ascend all the way to the top of Colorado's D pairs in a few short years. Offensively strong with breakout passes and shots from the point, he was honestly tough to give up because I really like him. He did have a concussion like symptom injury recently, but that's healing well according to reports, while Murray has had 3 now.
Murray is on the Penguins, but he's been quite very bad recently. Last year he was 49th in Save % and played disgustingly at the beginning of the year. His GAA was about the same spot in the league at nearly 3 GAA. He was outplayed badly by BACKUP GOALIE Casey DeSmith and AHL GOALIE Tristan Jarry. This year in his two starts he posted a 5.45 GAA and a .831 Save %... That's not the Murray that we used to see. For people who think this is a highway robbery, it's not. It has potential to be won by both sides. Two draft picks in the 50-65 range are nothing to sneeze at either, those can be solid NHL players with the right drafting, and from knowing Joe on HF and his prospect knowledge, I don't think those picks will be wasted.
Bettman: No such thing as a veto in NHL - Sportsnet.ca
You're ignoring the fact that Murray isn't what he was with injuries plaguing his career. Werenski is a surefire 20 year old top pairing defenseman at the time of the trade. Murray could never play a game in the league again for all we know.Uhh
Simplest way I can put it is
Murray >> Werenski
Not to mention I gave up a lot more than you did...for a far less valuable player.
And where are you getting that 500 point total from?
(not trying to start something here, just pleading my case)
Why would Joe do this trade if he thought he was going to lose?
Larsson is good for 19.8 points per 82 games per season.cmon man, you can't compare this deal to the Werenski trade..
Adam Larsson puts up 10 -20 pts per season
Meier is good for 40 fwd ish pts
Bear could end up with 20 pts in the NHL.
You could probably sign replacement players that put up the points that Larsson and Bear will in free agency every year.
Werenski will be a 50 point scorer for 10 more years. That's roughly defenseman 500 points and he also scores a good amount of goals. Werenski is the YOUNGEST PLAYER in the trade. Drai said he didn't even know what the league was entirely about yet at that point.
TRADE:
To BOS: Zach Werenski
To EDM: Adam Larsson, Timo Meier, Ethan Bear
You would've destroyed the trade then, now, and 10 years later, plus Drai didn't even know what was going on, and Joe has alreayd made several solid trades and knows the game.
This is why your opinion on this matter shouldn't be taken into consideration, just like mine shouldn't have had any impact on the Werenski veto decision.Matt Murray has severe risk attached, there's a chance he may never play again, even if that chance isn't 50/50, it's still a chance.
Neither are Bear, or Meier to that extent... but you essentially called them worthless, so...Timmins isn't an asset to sneeze at
Hey, I'll take your word for it because I honestly haven't seen him play much, but Timmins has all this potential that you've typed out but Bear and Meier have no ability to improve and become better players?as people have been suggesting. He's already going to play in the NHL this year at 20 years old and has the potential to ascend all the way to the top of Colorado's D pairs in a few short years. Offensively strong with breakout passes and shots from the point, he was honestly tough to give up because I really like him. He did have a concussion like symptom injury recently, but that's healing well according to reports, while Murray has had 3 now.
Murray is on the Penguins, but he's been quite very bad recently. Last year he was 49th in Save % and played disgustingly at the beginning of the year. His GAA was about the same spot in the league at nearly 3 GAA. He was outplayed badly by BACKUP GOALIE Casey DeSmith and AHL GOALIE Tristan Jarry. This year in his two starts he posted a 5.45 GAA and a .831 Save %... That's not the Murray that we used to see. For people who think this is a highway robbery, it's not. It has potential to be won by both sides. Two draft picks in the 50-65 range are nothing to sneeze at either, those can be solid NHL players with the right drafting, and from knowing Joe on HF and his prospect knowledge, I don't think those picks will be wasted.
Bettman: No such thing as a veto in NHL - Sportsnet.ca
Could you not say the same for Mcdrai?
Larsson is good for 19.8 points per 82 games per season.
Meier has literally played ONE season, yet you're already placing limitations on him. No idea what he is capable of especially on a stacked SJ team.
Bear could end up with 20 points, just like....Timmins? Bear had arguably just a good D+1 season and had a stellar rookie campaign in the AHL.
Clearly no bias from you here.
Werenski has had two seasons -- 47 points and 37 points -- and to say he will CONSISTENTLY put up 50 points is disingenuous, when he's never once done that.
Not to mention BEAR is the youngest player in that trade, so....
Also haven't been keeping track, but care to list the "solid" trades Joe has made? (Genuinely haven't been paying attention to thread, tbh).
P.S. - Where did you get this 500 point total from??? I don't think a single defenceman cracked 300 points last season, let alone 500...
This is why your opinion on this matter shouldn't be taken into consideration, just like mine shouldn't have had any impact on the Werenski veto decision.
Do you realistically believe Murray may NEVER play again?
If we're doing chances, there's a CHANCE that Timmins never makes the NHL and SJ dealt a starting, back-to-back cup winning 24 year old goaltender on an inarguable top 10 team for nothing.
Neither are Bear, or Meier to that extent... but you essentially called them worthless, so...
Didn't Timmins, just like Murray, have a concussion recently...? What if he never plays another game?
Hey, I'll take your word for it because I honestly haven't seen him play much, but Timmins has all this potential that you've typed out but Bear and Meier have no ability to improve and become better players?
1) You're using a 2 game sample size from Murray this season to indicate he's not the "Murray that we used to see"
2) Keep bringing up his injuries but perhaps those are the reason he isn't able to get into a groove? Injuries will eventually stop and he will get back to form...
3) What potential does SJ have to win this? Timmins becomes a 20-25 point defender (BEST CASE SCENARIO) which is the equivalent to..... someone you can nab through free agency!
4) Those picks are 1 and 2 years away, respectively, from even becoming players. From there you're looking at an additional 3-4 years before any impact is made at all. And that's assuming those picks are made properly, but the draft past the 1st/2nd can be a crap-shoot so...
How is this relevant?
We aren't the NHL and have already established that unfair deals will be vetoed. To turn around and allow all trades isn't fair to teams that already got the short end of the stick.
only thing worth replying to and that's arguably worse than the Werenski trade1) 7) he traded Nugent Hopkins for a 1st , 3rd, 3rd, 5th Martinook and Gibbons, a good start to rebuild, as well as Gostisbehere to ANA for a large package including A Nylander, McCann, Hutton and a bunch of picks (2nd, 3rd)
the only thing you can reply to**only thing worth replying to and that's arguably worse than the Werenski trade