I honestly think we should try to move down a few spots if the draft goes that way.
It's definitely something worth exploring but as mentionned by WTK, Juolevi could play for us this season. Which would make Emelin tradeable and give us even more cap for a top FA.
I guess it depends on how you feel about Juolevi. Personally, I'm not huge on him... He sounds a bit too vanilla to me. If we move back around 12th, we can still nab one of Keller, Jost or Sergachev. And we probably add another high 2nd rounder on top of it.
Juolevi, if he pans out, is the perfect compliment to a guy like Subban and is a good successor to Markov. He's not a big shooter, but he's got great vision, great passer, handles the puck well, smart defensively, active defensively, good positioning, great stick.
You can put him next to Subban and not worry about a thing.
I guess it depends on how you feel about Juolevi. Personally, I'm not huge on him... He sounds a bit too vanilla to me. If we move back around 12th, we can still nab one of Keller, Jost or Sergachev. And we probably add another high 2nd rounder on top of it.
I dunno, I'm just leery picking any defenseman at this point in the draft. It feels like a lot of the D ranked around or just outside the top 10 look great before their draft year but ultimately end up underwhelming.
I like Juolevi but if he turns into a Dmitry Kulikov...Kulikov is a fine defenseman and all but wouldn't be great value for a #9 pick.
I feel like picking a forward is going with the safer bet with the better likelihood of hitting his ceiling. And gets you somebody who, generally speaking, can play in your lineup sooner.
Whatever we do, we can't afford to screw this pick up, that's for sure.
There were some pretty good ones drafted in that area recently: Brodin, Fowler, Maatta, Trouba, Dumba, Ellis, Ristolainen, Ceci.
Players who are looking good but it's too early to tell: Zadorov, Provorov, Morrissey.
If they feel the D is the best player, then they should go for it in my book.