Prospect Info: HFCBJ 2022 Summer Prospect Rankings: #5

[Cowumbus]

Yeah he's a late bloomer. I'm not sure what the relevance of that is. I'm more interested in what a player's current level is, and if anything, a sharply positive trajectory outweighs what a player was doing three years ago.

So he’s a better prospect than Jiricek

He's definitely different than the rest of our pool and most prospects.

Yeah he’s 1-5 years older.

I like Blankenburg, and I think he’s an NHL player. But realistically his ceiling is not very high. He has no elite tools in his toolbox. Kind of funny he’s even a prospect at 24 (yes I know the reqs). Same age as Peeke.

 

[thebus88]

Ceulemans add Foudy.

Carlsson got time in the playoffs, he didn't look like he was a regular NHLer when he joined though. Blankenberg stepped right in and looked like he belonged and was praised by Larsen for being the masterclass of how to play D. Completely different scenarios IMO.

Probably the most ridiculous/terrible decision by both Jarmo and Torts that isn’t really talked about.

How either guy thought it was the correct decision to play him in the playoffs, or even in the NHL at that time, I’ll have no idea.

He looked terrible back then. Hilarious back and forth debates regarding how good he could possibly become. That said, I think he’s actually turned into an ‘ok’ defenseman and I would have kept him as a 6-7 defenseman over some other guys that are looked at as way better players than they should be and much higher cap hit than they should have.

Yes, Peeke, Gavrikov and Boqvist.

 

[LJ7]

Yeah he’s 1-5 years older.

I like Blankenburg, and I think he’s an NHL player. But realistically his ceiling is not very high. He has no elite tools in his toolbox. Kind of funny he’s even a prospect at 24 (yes I know the reqs). Same age as Peeke.

Who all do you think should be ranked over Blankenburg because of that?

 

[thebus88]

Yes.. which was my point .. Blankenburg played played 7 meaningless games at end of season, and many are high on him.. You can’t remember how high everyone was with Carlsson, after stepping in 5 games and looking good in the playoffs and being praised by Torts ? That was point I was making . We all have different opinions , I just don’t remotely think he’s one of our top 8 prospects right now… For example Tarasov was pretty dominant in a handful of starts, Foudy is 22, been injured and Covid season, but near a point per game in AHL past 2 seasons . I need to see more of Blankenburg , other than 7 meaningless games out of the playoff race, late in the season , from an undrafted player , especially with him being 24 already .

Gabriel Carlsson Quietly Impressing Blue Jackets

One of the strengths of the Columbus Blue Jackets is their depth on the blue line. Learn how rookie Gabriel Carlsson is making a good impression.

thehockeywriters.com

I get what you are tryin to say on Blankenburg and the “sample size”.

It’ll be hard to get people to admit what they once thought about Carlsson. Plenty of fans were saying ridiculous things about him, and once again, just the decision itself to have him around the team at that time was just wrong.

If it makes you feel any better, people will surely turn on Blankenburg after a couple bad months next year, like they have with Carlsson and countless others.

 

[cslebn]

Voronkov

 

[KJ Dangler]

Who all do you think should be ranked over Blankenburg because of that?

Kids that have dominated the level of competition they faced, and how that should translate to the NHL …. Blakenburgs highlight was honorable mention for big 10 conference .

I need to really ponder my list , but KJ, Jiricek, Mateychuk, Marchenko, Cuelemans , Tarasov, Foudy, Luca Del Belluz, Voronkov, Dumais , Svozil , Angle, TFW, Malatesta, and Richard would be quickly spit balling it , with Blankenburg after this tier .

 

[thebus88]

Blanks had 69 points in 133 ncaa games , and was nothing more than average until his senior yr , where he was a 24 yr old … all I’m saying is it’s silly to have discussions of him being one of our top 10 prospects . Especially when you consider his size and age . He’s definitely worth taking a flyer on if your Jarmo

While we can debate the term “prospect” in regards to his age, and I can understand you not understanding why anybody would vote for him now as a “top 5 prospect” over Mateychuk and Ceulemans, but, Ceulemans was just voted over the dude 40-5, and to say it’s “silly” to consider Blankenburg a “top 10” prospect, is, well, silly.

 

[I3LI3]

really surprised to see Luca getting more votes than Tarasov at this point.

 

[thebus88]

Unfortunately we as a people are influenced by recency bias … Like I said , Blankenburg may be good, but it was a super small sample size in meaningless games .

I need to really ponder my list , but KJ, Jiricek, Mateychuk, Marchenko, Cuelemans , Tarasov, Foudy, Luca Del Belluz, Voronkov, Dumais , Svozil , Angle, TFW, Malatesta, and Richard would be quickly spit balling it , with Blankenburg after this tier .

You’re going too far and showing your “recency bias”. As “meaningless” as much of Blankenburg’s NHL time has been, it’s STILL the NHL.

You’re giving way too much credence to “potential” or young age. The odds of all those guys (deservedly) making the NHL is a VERY LOW number. Good chance only 2-3 guys ever make it, in any type of role.

 

[Fro]

really surprised to see Luca getting more votes than Tarasov at this point.

I voted that way bc of the injury...not sure he reaches his ceiling until I see him back on the ice

 

[CBJx614]

Blankenburg wasn’t even first or 2nd team All Big 10 . Cmon people get a grip . This is silly

so because he wasnt first or second team all big 10, he'll never become anything at the next level? Are you missing a

 

[KJ Dangler]

so because he wasnt first or second team all big 10, he'll never become anything at the next level? Are you missing a

No.. I have him right there with Christansen .

 

[thebus88]

So he’s a better prospect than Jiricek


Yeah he’s 1-5 years older.

I like Blankenburg, and I think he’s an NHL player. But realistically his ceiling is not very high. He has no elite tools in his toolbox. Kind of funny he’s even a prospect at 24 (yes I know the reqs). Same age as Peeke.

Regarding “ceiling” and these 2 players, people seem to think Peeke has TONS of room for growth, both physically and the mental side of the game…..

 

[stevo61]

Yes.

But his upside isn’t as high as the guys we drafted in the first round.

I agree which is why im voting for them. But not so sure I agree with the poster claiming hes not top 10 and thats more where my arguement lies. I personally have Jiricek-Ceulemans-Mateychuk as 2, 3 and 4 in my rankings

 

[NotWendell]

Voted Tarasov, add Foudy

 

[Nanabijou]

Add Foudy.

 

[majormajor]

Good point. But the comment from Lars was based, again, on just 7 games. Hey, the kid looked very comfortable and I really like his game/style. All I'm saying is an 82 game season is a huge ass physical grind and there are not that many players that can hack that (I think we only had two). My hope for him is that he can handle it. Based on just 7 games...maybe he can...and if so, good for him and the team. He does bring an infectious amount of energy and is really helping create a huge internal battle for a roster spot. All positives.

I don't know if his body can handle it either, but I think he already knows the stuff you'd want your young D to learn in the AHL.

No.. I have him right there with Christansen .

Christiansen never looked like an NHLer to me. Maybe he'll squeak in on a team that needs a #2PP QB but that's about it. A bit of scoring potential and everything else is substandard.

 

[Fro]

I thought Christiansen looked every bit as good as Blanky in his chances...saw inexperienced mistakes, but was in great position a lot of the time...needs to bulk up a bit but he definitely is a 4/5 guy (imo) if he does

 

[WannabeFinn]

add Pyyhtia

 

[LetsGOJackets!!]

Cooly, add Foudy

 

[Halberdier]

So he’s a better prospect than Jiricek


Yeah he’s 1-5 years older.

I like Blankenburg, and I think he’s an NHL player. But realistically his ceiling is not very high. He has no elite tools in his toolbox. Kind of funny he’s even a prospect at 24 (yes I know the reqs). Same age as Peeke.

Blankenburg is ~20 days younger than Laine. "Prospect" Joona Luoto is more than 6 months older than both of them

For me it's quite hard to decide should I vote for someone like Mateychuck, Jiricek who have a high ceiling or someone like Marchenko that is probably tearing it up next season. I ended up having them 2. Jiricek, 3. Marchenko, 4. Mateychuck.

Marchenko has also high ceiling, so he is not maybe the best example, but deciding between like Mateychuk & Blankenburg should be a better one: latter should be better for the next season, but what about 4 years from now?

 

[DoingItCoolKiwi]

Add Dumais

 

[LazyCircuits]

Going to keep picking Tarasov
Add Dumais