Apparently the whistle is irrelevant. Intent to not blow the whistle must be a rule alsoKeep your eyes on the puck, kids.
Yeah was blown just before the puck went inIg the whistle went? So everyone assumed it was dead? I didn't see when the whistle went though, just guessing
what a joke. They think the puck is under the goalie but wait 20 scoonds to blow the whistle.Yeah was blown just before the puck went in
Yes. Anything to give a US team the lead.TSN explained it. Basically even if the ref blows the whistle, if it's deemed to be in "continuous motion" the goal can still count. Zamula shot the puck before the whistle blew, so it really had no effect on the play.
Don't forget to blame Toronto too!Yes. Anything to give a US team the lead.
Sogarbage gives up another one.
True. Ottawa is screwed twice. Not a US team and disliked by Toronto.Don't forget to blame Toronto too!
Now give my team the best player since Lemieux
SC ring parking only
TSN explained it. Basically even if the ref blows the whistle, if it's deemed to be in "continuous motion" the goal can still count. Zamula shot the puck before the whistle blew, so it really had no effect on the play.
It makes sense in that they rule based on what they want to happen. Why they want that result is the question.I’ve seen too many goals waived off because a ref blew a whistle the moment a puck crossed the line or even after the puck went in the net for this to make any sense.
20 secondswhat a joke. They think the puck is under the goalie but wait 20 scoonds to blow the whistle.