HFBoards 2018 Stanley Cup Favourites 1-31

haveandare

Registered User
Jul 2, 2009
18,924
7,453
New York
You realize you’re talking about a team that’s best player was a rookie last season, right? I thought they looked great against us in the first round and they’re only going to be better this season. Babcock is the best coach in the league.

I get that it’s fashionable to hate on them because of how obnoxious the fanbase can be on here but they’re clearly one of the best teams in the East.

I don't hate them, I'm just not drunk on the Kool aid with them. We've heard the same story a million times with a million teams that had a lot of exciting young players and didn't pan out as a whole group.

They're not one of the best teams in the east until they prove themselves to be exactly that based on the actual results of their actual play.
 

Carlzner

Registered User
Oct 31, 2011
16,696
6,891
Denver, CO
Did those other teams have Babcock?

Last season was the first playoffs for their young core which has a ton of potential, and they played a very good Washington team. They looked great and I honestly believe the results will start to come this season.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,102
9,885
You realize there is a difference between taking out 16 random games and taking out a clear exception right? In 2012 the Rangers got a boost from an eight game win streak. Without it, they would have been on pace for 103 points, which was around the Flyers and Devils. Guess what? They were much closer to those two teams than to the best in the east. Guess what happened when they faced a team that was actually good in the playoffs?

They got completely outcoached?
 

haveandare

Registered User
Jul 2, 2009
18,924
7,453
New York
Did those other teams have Babcock?

Last season was the first playoffs for their young core which has a ton of potential, and they played a very good Washington team. They looked great and I honestly believe the results will start to come this season.

Did a bunch of Detroit iterations that didn't win or come close have Babcock?

I believe it's likely that they will be better this year but I think it's a bit much to rank them so highly based on what they're actually done.
 

Carlzner

Registered User
Oct 31, 2011
16,696
6,891
Denver, CO
I didn’t say they’ll win the cup this season. But I think they’re definitely a better team than a few of the ones in front of them on this list.
 

mashedpotato

full stack.
Jan 10, 2012
2,153
385
Did a bunch of Detroit iterations that didn't win or come close have Babcock?

I believe it's likely that they will be better this year but I think it's a bit much to rank them so highly based on what they're actually done.

You're missing the point of a Ranking list. It's meant to describe team projections based not only on what they've actually done, but what they have the potential to do....
 

NeedleInTheHay

Registered User
Mar 26, 2008
7,007
1,104
Nashville and Columbus are way too high. What's with this site and propping up small markets? Hipsterdom? Pity?
 

NeedleInTheHay

Registered User
Mar 26, 2008
7,007
1,104
Where were you last year when Nashville made the cup finals and Columbus put it all together? In hipsterdom?

Nashville went on a fluke run in a very weak west last year, Columbus also had a fluke season which promptly ended in 5 games.

Edm, stl, and anaheim are clearly better than Nashville.

And in the metro alone, Pitt, wsh, and nyr are better than Columbus.
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
142,689
113,327
NYC
You talk as if what youre saying is a certainty but it isnt.

New York has old Lunqvist, Mcdonagh, and then nothing. Theyre best forward might be Zibanejad. Count me unimpressed.

Minnesota also has painfully average forwards (with Granlund and Koivu as youre best centers theyre not going anywhere anyway).
Their strength is defense but theyre best D-man Suter has been as disappointing in the playoffs the last few years as a franchise D can be.
Oh, and their coach is Boudreau whose allergic to the big games.

St. Louis/Ottawa are even with CBJ and even that's not cut and dry.

Ottawa rode Karlsson's brilliance to the conference finals, when he was off the ice they were pretty unimpressive.
St. Louis is a deeper team but they have the same issues as CBJ (lack of high forwards) and they dont have a goalie the quality of Bob.

This is all nice conjecture, but again, I'm still waiting for Columbus to win a series.
 

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
Well, they rode a ridiculous, unsustainable hot streak to a good record last year. Outside of the streak they were mediocre. They were awful at the end of the season and in the playoffs. Plus Torts.

Yeah I could see the argument that they're a little high... but I think they're solidly in that 2nd tier of teams below Pittsburgh... and they have the skill and depth that they could win a championship.
 

bigbuffalo313

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
4,135
57
New York
Its funny the Jackets would be getting more respect if they lost a game in the middle of that stretch.

And to answer your question, no I don't think it's appropriate to cut out only one teams best stretch and not others. Teams generally have stretches of play that deviate from their average performance in the rest of the year. If you're going to do it for one team, do it for every team.

I'd be more sympathetic to your argument if the Jackets had a poor record after all teams had their best 20 game stretch cut out. Instead they still have one of the best records.

No, it would be more respectable if it was spread out more. Most teams best stretch in a season is about 5 wins in a row on average (I'm completely guessing here, but I don't recall longer streaks happening very often). 16 in a row is a clear outlier
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
No, it would be more respectable if it was spread out more. Most teams best stretch in a season is about 5 wins in a row on average (I'm completely guessing here, but I don't recall longer streaks happening very often). 16 in a row is a clear outlier

When I'm going through data and cutting out outliers I don't cut out the best 20% of it for one team/thing. That's just biasing my own sample. What you can do is take out the bottom 20% and the top 20% of the season for every team, though even that risks biasing the sample.

Since being spread out is important to you, though, I'm sure you would appreciate that the Jackets didn't lose three straight games until April. No other team made it that far.
 

bigbuffalo313

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
4,135
57
New York
When I'm going through data and cutting out outliers I don't cut out the best 20% of it for one team/thing. That's just biasing my own sample. What you can do is take out the bottom 20% and the top 20% of the season for every team, though even that risks biasing the sample.

Since being spread out is important to you, though, I'm sure you would appreciate that the Jackets didn't lose three straight games until April. No other team made it that far.

1) There's a difference between taking out random games and acknowledging something that's a clear outlier

2) If a team has 16 losses in a row that tanked their season, I would acknowledge it as an outlier as well. Besides I don't remember the Jackets having an equally bad streak that would essentially cancel out the 16 win streak and make them even

3) A team could win one game than lose the next for the entire season. They would never have a two game losing streak but still wouldn't be good. When I say spread it out, I mean basically be consistenty good throughout the entire season. Not be fantastic for a few weeks and on pace to miss the playoffs the rest of the season
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Sydney Swans @ Hawthorn Hawks
    Sydney Swans @ Hawthorn Hawks
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $5,720.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $1,447.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $220.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $240.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $265.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad