So it looks like it's a BPA (Slaf) vs desperate need of a center (Cooley) for the voting.
The only post-olympics rankings I've seen that have Slaf ahead of Cooley are the two Athletic writers. The highlight packages for Slaf are pretty underwhelming for a top pick beyond an absolute burner of a wrister. Cooley looks like a small, fast center with a great shot and good passing like Hughes. I voted BPA and it was Cooley.So it looks like it's a BPA (Slaf) vs desperate need of a center (Cooley) for the voting.
The only post-olympics rankings I've seen that have Slaf ahead of Cooley are the two Athletic writers. The highlight packages for Slaf are pretty underwhelming for a top pick beyond an absolute burner of a wrister. Cooley looks like a small, fast center with a great shot and good passing like Hughes. I voted BPA and it was Cooley.
I actually believe Cooley is the better prospect.So it looks like it's a BPA (Slaf) vs desperate need of a center (Cooley) for the voting.
Me, too. He didn't have the best WJC points wise, but I thought that was partly due to just bad luck. He oozed talent and hockey IQ, to me.I actually believe Cooley is the better prospect.
I really, really like Nemec, and can't really explain why i didn't pick him over Cooley. Doesn't seem to have a weakness. With him, the hope is that he will be ready for some NHL time in 23-24, and at least one of Lambos/Hunt/ROR.I think the team needs a 1C and a 1D, after Wright, I'm not sure Cooley is a 1C, so I went with the guy I think can be a 1D.