RempireStateBuilding
Registered User
Not to mention, with something like this I assume the majority of the concern is preventing further complications. With how well the team and Talbot are playing there is no incentive to be anything other than ridiculously cautious. No reason to take any risks.
I remember seeing a tweet saying the injury was due to his head snapping back, not because of the puck hitting him/damage to veins? If that was the case, surely they had to look back over things and reevaluate going forward. Doubt they'd want to release all these statements saying "Oh it was a vascula--no it's a muscle str--no wait, it's.." and just leave it at he's being evaluated.