Hart Trophy: Who has better claim?

OurlordAndSaviorKuch

Number one Bull$hit
Oct 12, 2011
10,955
8,354
Tampa Florida
Game 6, 2022 Stanley Cup Final. Avalanche are up 3-2 in the series vs the vaunted Tampa Bay Lightning who are looking to become a dynasty.

Nathan MacKinnon 1g 1a for 2 points.
Kucherov no points.

Avalanche win the game 3-2. Series over (4-2) and Avalanche win the cup. The better player elevated his team when it mattered. Great point Outl4w.


Congrats except Kuch already has two cups.

So I guess slow claps for Avs fans on that

It evens out.

Players seemingly only want to play in warm and sunny tax free states and the media simply will not vote for anyone who plays there.

Yeah that’s totally the only reason we have the players we do.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,812
11,139
Start of year I went Dallas Florida, still kind of leaning that way.
Final 4. I have is Edmonton vs Dallas and Florida vs Carolina. So I’ll pick players from those 4 teams likely.
 

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
16,134
8,607
Tampa Bay
But it wasn't a threepeat since the Avalanche stomped the piss out of them. I know you don't follow hockey very much but losing our Captain has been a heavy cost. He hasn't played since June 26th 2022.

You make some fair points in favor of Mackinnon but this is absolute bullshit, you barely skirted by in six. You had a cake route to the finals, swept a charmony soft Edmonton team, and three of your four wins were by one goal. If you lost Rantanen for the entire postseason like we were missing Point, you don't win the Cup either.

It was a great series, don't disrespect how hard both teams fought and made it to try and make a bad point.
 

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
2,654
2,848
The Tampa vs Colorado "my player's better than yours" pissing match is starting to be just as cringe-worthy as the Crosby vs McDavid/Ovi pissing matches. I can only imagine how terrible it'll be if Mackinnon actually winds up winning the Hart over him.
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,198
9,913
The Tampa vs Colorado "my player's better than yours" pissing match is starting to be just as cringe-worthy as the Crosby vs McDavid/Ovi pissing matches. I can only imagine how terrible it'll be if Mackinnon actually winds up winning the Hart over him.
Ya the whining from kucherov fans is gonna be endless.
 

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
16,134
8,607
Tampa Bay
Kucherov needed to hit 150 points, anything "close" gets journalists off the hook to pick their narrative, and there is no narrative where the introverted Russian from Florida wins. Just reality
 
  • Like
Reactions: kp61c

TheStatican

Registered User
Mar 14, 2012
1,657
1,368
Kuch got 4 more points, that's a difference of less than 3% He achieved this by have 11 more assists, but at the same time scored 7 less goals. That is essentially a wash.

Also since when has shooting percentage EVER MATTERED in any significant way ever? Ovechkin was 56th in shooting percentage(players with 40 or more games played) when he scored 65 goals in 2008-09 a year that some people consider to be - not me, but it's up there - the greatest goals scoring season ever

The strongest argument for Kucherov is his higher percentage of involvement in the teams offensive production. Kuch's being 49.4% and Mac 46.0% credit to Kuch for his advantage but it's not a huge advantage by any means. But MacKinnon registered nearly a 100 more(32%) more shots while having only 12% less assists than Kucherov, does this not actually show that MacKinnon was actually the one who was more involved in his teams offensive play?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
16,134
8,607
Tampa Bay
Kuch got 4 more points, that's a difference of less than 3% He achieved this by have 11 more assists, but at the same time scored 7 less goals. That is essentially a wash.

Kucherov scored 144 points in 1755 minutes, that's a point every 12.1875 minutes. At 20 minutes a game that is 134.5 points

Mackinnon scored 140 points in 1871 minutes, that's a point every 13.3642 minutes. At 20 minutes a game that is 122.7 points

That's a 9% difference. Kucherov is 9% more productive than Mackinnon
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,198
9,913
Kucherov scored 144 points in 1755 minutes, that's a point every 12.1875 minutes

Mackinnon scored 140 points in 1871 minutes, that's a point every 13.3642 minutes

That's a 9% difference. Kucherov is 9% more productive than Mackinnon
Kucherov's must have terrible cardio to not handle the minutes :).
 

ThunderRoad

Registered User
Apr 24, 2006
810
290
Tampa
Wingers just aren't as valuable as centers so they wont win many harts anyways.
Which is why Kucherov putting up the numbers he does, beating and rivaling the centers makes what he accomplished that much more impressive. And why if he's just a winger, should put him above the others because he's doing it from the "less valuable" position. Plus, he's doing it when he doesn't have "better" physical attributes to his game (he's not as fast as Mackinnon or McDavid, doesn't have as hard of a shot as his own teammates, let alone those guys in consideration for the Hart, his size isn't remarkable, etc) but no other player matches him in hockey IQ in today's game. Celebral over power. And considering the complete dismal cluster that has been Tampa's defensive output this season, him being one of the very few with a positive +/ - in that team stat helps show his value to the Lightning even more (when he's said to be such a defensive liability around these parts).
 

Outl4w

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
3,578
2,055
FL
Kucherov's must have terrible cardio to not handle the minutes :).
If you have hockey knowledge by playing or watching the game it had more to do with center versus winger. Top 6 centers play more because there are 4 centers in your line up and top 6 wingers play less because their are 8 wingers in a line up. Also being a center does give you a slight advantage to get more assist in offensive face-offs to a winger. I played center my whole life and still do. I rack up a lot of points winning the face off cleanly back to point or winger . If they shoot it or pass it to the guy that scores you get an assist. As a winger you are less likely to get the first or secondary assist from a offensive zone faceoff goal. The point gap from most points in top scoring mackinnon center to second mcdavid is not nearly as wide as it is from kucherov.to second winger. There is a reason for that. Top6 Centers get more ice time on average then your top 6 wingers and they can rack.up points in the offensive zone faceoff easier. Also they tend to be in the center of.the ice in both zones which means they are more likely.to get the puck passed to them then a winger. It isn't always the case but is true in most.cases why you usually see more centers finishing with more points then wingers. Kucherov completely dominated the nhl from the wing. If we posted a highlight reel of all of mackinnons points and kucherov points the wow factor wouldn't even be close. Mackinnon is just an elite two way center who has great offensive instincts and skill, but he doesn't blow you away with 3-4 highlight real passes, dekes, shots,goals, or setup plays per game like kucherov. Kucherov offensive iq is in the top 5 players of all time when it comes to making plays and space out of nowhere. McDavid,Gretzky, crosby, jagr, and kucherov are the only guys I have seen be able to make the dirtiest play look simple on a nightly basis with their hockey iqs. Mackinnon is a great player and barring major injury hof and kucherov is already there with his awards and records.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flying squirrel

Coffey

☠️not a homer☠️
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2017
10,146
15,819
Phase 4 HMV
“It’s his time” is definitely going to play a factor for voters.

Heart = Mack
Brain = Kuch
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad