Kadri was traded for spare parts from Toronto and found success playing with top tier players in Colorado. Logan is a seven time 25 goal scorer. Nazim did it twice in back to back years in Toronto almost a decade ago. Logan had more PPG, SHG (which Kadri doesn’t even do) and GWG. He plays more than a minute more per game which means he’s probably utilized in more important scenarios. Last year he still put up 27 goals playing with a mix of Noah Gregor, Barabanov, Matt nieto and Andreas Johansson.
Man your analysis on Kadri being traded from Toronto to the Avs for spare parts shows a lack of nuance and I'll help you out here.
1. Kadri was done in Toronto because of back to back first year playoff exits in which Kadri got suspended for the rest of the first round, his value was low due to that.
2. The spare parts that he was trade for included the future top scoring Dman in the 20-21 in the NHL and Kerfoot who was a decent middle 6 center.
Maybe Couture is better than Kadri but if the scale is 100 and Couture is 100 , Kadri is in the high 90s we are talking about what these players are doing now and will do in the future not what happened 5 years ago.
Not really. You’re looking at things strictly through the lens of points production. I’m merely stating his return had a much more profound effect on the team than you’re accepting, and I assume much of that is due to the fact that you’re basing everything off a stat sheet and not actually watching what his contributions are. The points will come but declaring him basically toast because he hasn’t put up points 6 games into a return from an injury he thought, at one point, he wouldn’t return from is a knee jerk reaction.
I stated that I haven't seen him play upon his return then you replied that 6 games wasn't a fair enough example to evaluate him on the counting stats but then when on to do so with your POV which I dare say might have rose colored vision here?
The whole argument is pretty moot as the Bruins, nor any other team, aren't trading for that contract.
