Proposal: Hampus Lindholm for Nylander + Dermott + 1st

Status
Not open for further replies.

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
48,442
39,411
Orange County, CA
The gap between Lindholm and Dermott is not a 1st and Nylander. Not by a country mile.

It’s like if you win a Ferrari in a lottery and you decline it because you don’t really need a Ferrari and you don’t want the hassle of trying to sell your Land Rover.

Like, ****! It’s a free Ferrari! Take it and begin solving the problems it creates for you because you’re still at a much better place than when you started.
Are you implying the Ducks would be a better team if they made this trade? Lol.
 

beebuzz

Registered User
Nov 30, 2018
38
27
Ducks would never do this. No reason for them to, imo.
He’s worth more to the Ducks than the others are.
Also, the Leafs have enough on their plate with the dmen scramble they have this year. No need to try and introduce a new body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mymerlincat

Skolman

Registered User
Feb 16, 2018
9,498
8,089
Rakell scored 69 points for us 2 seasons ago. Marner would probably be someone in the 80s, if that, considering he won’t have a Tavares to play with here, and would make between 6-7 million more per year. The difference between the 2 is not a top 10 defenseman in the league.
:laugh: Lindholm isn't a top 10 defenseman in the league...
 

Sean Garrity

Quack Quack Quack!
Dec 25, 2007
17,455
6,084
Dee Eff UU
The gap between Lindholm and Dermott is not a 1st and Nylander. Not by a country mile.

It’s like if you win a Ferrari in a lottery and you decline it because you don’t really need a Ferrari and you don’t want the hassle of trying to sell your Land Rover.

Like, ****! It’s a free Ferrari! Take it and begin solving the problems it creates for you because you’re still at a much better place than when you started.

Can you please break it down like I’m 5.
 

TopShelfWaterBottle

Registered
Mar 16, 2014
3,386
1,382
The gap between Lindholm and Dermott is not a 1st and Nylander. Not by a country mile.

It’s like if you win a Ferrari in a lottery and you decline it because you don’t really need a Ferrari and you don’t want the hassle of trying to sell your Land Rover.

Like, ****! It’s a free Ferrari! Take it and begin solving the problems it creates for you because you’re still at a much better place than when you started.
Again, I’ll say it so you can understand better

Anaheim needs lindholm more than all the above pieces

AINEC
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
40,600
36,224
The gap between Lindholm and Dermott is not a 1st and Nylander. Not by a country mile.

It’s like if you win a Ferrari in a lottery and you decline it because you don’t really need a Ferrari and you don’t want the hassle of trying to sell your Land Rover.

Like, ****! It’s a free Ferrari! Take it and begin solving the problems it creates for you because you’re still at a much better place than when you started.
The gap between lindholm and dermott is pretty significant.

Free is never free, gas milage is bad... if something breaks down its more to repair, higher insurance.

You analogy sucks almost as much as the idea that dermott is almost as good as lindholm
 

ayrton2388

Registered User
May 23, 2014
776
330
Lindholm would be the 3rd or 4th best defenceman on Toronto, why would they trade a top 10 winger, arguably top 5, in the league for him?

The guy has done nothing to show he is worth anywhere near a player of Marner’s caliber and is at best a #3 dman on a contending team. Weird how he’s getting so much love still.

3rd or 4th best D on that team?
Jesus f***ing f***, dude.

And Toronto fans keep wondering why other people keep bashing and making fun of them.
3rd or 4th... Jeez....

With a defense where Lindholm is your 4th best D, a "top 3 goalie in the league" and all those 7 "top line wingers" that you claim to have, why couldn't you make it past the 1st round in the playoffs?

This thread need to die. It has really, really ran it's course.
 

Jack Bauer

Registered User
May 30, 2007
6,154
743
Cape Breton
3rd or 4th best D on that team?
Jesus ****ing ****, dude.

And Toronto fans keep wondering why other people keep bashing and making fun of them.
3rd or 4th... Jeez....

With a defense where Lindholm is your 4th best D, a "top 3 goalie in the league" and all those 7 "top line wingers" that you claim to have, why couldn't you make it past the 1st round in the playoffs?

This thread need to die. It has really, really ran it's course.

The NHL playoff format pitting 2 amazing teams vs each other in round 1 doesn't make the less inexperienced 7 game loser have any less potential.

What a weak argument to make to try and discredit that Toronto is a legit threat with an excellent young core.

There is and was no shame in losing to an excellent Boston team.
 

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
48,442
39,411
Orange County, CA
3rd or 4th best D on that team?
Jesus ****ing ****, dude.

And Toronto fans keep wondering why other people keep bashing and making fun of them.
3rd or 4th... Jeez....

With a defense where Lindholm is your 4th best D, a "top 3 goalie in the league" and all those 7 "top line wingers" that you claim to have, why couldn't you make it past the 1st round in the playoffs?

This thread need to die. It has really, really ran it's course.
You’re right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad