If Tkatchuk’s QO is 9M then its a definite no to the original offer. Habs can’t afford thay contract and are better off with KK and Romanov as cost controlled plays who have huge potential. Flames ate gonna have to pay MY his money!
The QO thing is blown way over. Yes it's 9 mil, but that's more protection for MT if somehow the contract negotiations go badly sideways. MT will do what's best for him, but unlike his dad, I don't think it will always completely mean "best = max money". I honestly believe that his next contract will be less than 9 mil. But negotiations wise, I'd wonder if it's an arguments between mid term vs long term contracts (ie: $8 x 5 years vs $8 x 8 years; where he's aiming for the best circumstances for another pay day around the age of 27-29). MT could hold out or just take the 1 year 9 mil QO, but I'd honestly believe it hurts him more than helps him to go down that path.
Furthermore, if you're asking for Tkachuk, there's a difference between the Flames asking for certain players is a bad roster fit for the Habs thus would declined vs we are not allowed to ask at all. There is absolutely no one on the Habs who cannot enter the conversation at all if Tkachuk is on the table. However, it's fair that Habs are completely not interested in moving a guy like Suzuki for Tkachuk because it wrecks their already fragile centre make up.
But don't act like negotiating Suzuki in for a potential Tkachuk trade is like putting an average middle 6 player for a top 10 in the league player. They are similar calibre of value players. This isn't like starting with Mangiapane or Dube and blowing up the ask to a Draisaitl or Makar calibre of player. Habs can absolutely decline/counter offer/ask for a bit more, but it is not unreasonable to bring Suzuki's name in as part of the discussion.