People who have always hated Daniel Alfredsson feel vindicated somehow.
Those who have always liked him:
(a) Still support him.
(b) Have moved on - he's on another team.
(c) Hold a grudge.
Dude... Ive never been an Alfie fan... Im glad he is gone... There is nothing for me to "let go" of...
I agree he was a good soldier for us but that doesnt mean anything when you pull off what he did... Heatley was a good soldier while he was here too... He had an NTC and used it to veto a trade to a place he didnt want to go...
Not even going to bother opening the link, but how could you even compare Alfie to Heatley and Yashin?
Not even going to bother opening the link, but how could you even compare Alfie to Heatley and Yashin?
You know how they say there are no dumb questions? Well...
Its the Down Goes Brown guy who wrote the article. He's a Leaf fan who lives in Ottawa and loves poking fun the Sens and their fans.
Good soldiers don't come into a season fat and out of shape and this is also the reason why he has taken such down slope in is career. He was there for the paycheck and couldn't care less about anyone else. He produced but do not compare him to Alfie.
I don't begrudge Heatley for leaving. While everyone was going: "OMG! OMG! WHYYYYYYYYYY???" some took a step back and saw:
-Multiple coaches
-Emery madness
-Fractured dressing room
-General team malaise
Alfie had every right to leave under any circumstance he wanted so I cant compare him to the other two. I'm dissapointed and dont wish him any success on Detroit. I wish him failure after failure, but I'm not gonna cry over his worthless ass anymore.
As for Yashin and Heatley. When the Yashin trade happened I remember the writers saying that basically what Ottawa was getting was a #1C in Spez, a tough role player D in Chara and a throwaway in McKult. McKult didnt score a goal all year (awesome lol always wished he stayed haha) Chara turned into Chara and Spezza is still around so I think ppl knew we won that trade.
The Heatley trade looked horrendous when it happened but could you imagine if you did the Edmonton deal? Cogliano is a bust, Penner was ok but Michalek is better. The only difference is that we would have had Smid instead of a 2nd. 2nd was used on Lehner.
I think we did good on both. Hopefully the trend continues and Alfie can suck moving forward a lot like Yashin and Heater.
People who have always hated Daniel Alfredsson feel vindicated somehow.
Those who have always liked him:
(a) Still support him.
(b) Have moved on - he's on another team.
(c) Hold a grudge.
What I don't understand about the Alfredsson situation is the blank cheque defense by ownership.
Wasn't he told during the negotiations that:
1) The Sens had a self imposed $50 cap on salaries.
2) The Sens were close to making a trade for Bobby Ryan and his $5,562,500 salary.
If Alfredsson or his agent did the math didn't that leave roughly $7 million in salary to sign Alfredsson, Cowen, Wiercioch, and a depth defensemen. The more Alfie takes the less their is to make the team competitive, for a 17 year veteran with his only goal being a Stanley Cup, that's not really a blank cheque.
When the majority of the teams in the Sens division are spending $15 million more on salaries than Ottawa and ownership is not able or willing to take on any salary during the season to improve the team whether it is a contender or even battling for a playoff spot that is a nightmare for a player in Alfredsson's situation.
If Alfredsson retires he's a hero but he chooses to chase a cup with a team that is more committed to winning and he's a villain?
We did not get a 2nd in the Heatley deal. Lehner was drafted with the 2nd we got from the Vermette-Leclaire trade.
B
No grudge but will only support him if Detroit does not eliminate Ottawa.
And if anyone doesn't remember, that 2nd rounder was traded for 24 games of Andy Sutton.
Can you honestly look at both Detroit and Ottawa on paper and say that Detroit is a significantly better team than Ottawa? Or, can you look at Detroit compared to the rest of the league and definitively say that they have one of the best shots at the Cup?
That's what irks me -- he said he wanted to pursue a Cup (which is fine by me) but he went to a team that's marginally better than Ottawa is, even with Alfredsson. And even that's debatable.
I'm a Rangers fan so trust me I know the value of basing teams success by what they look like on paper.
I don't think it was the rosters that made Detroit more appealing than Ottawa. It was an ownership that has a history of giving it's players the best opportunity to win the Stanley Cup every year. Detroit's track record pretty much speaks for itself and it's move to the perceived weaker conference with a much lighter travel schedule could make them even stronger.
It could, and I'm sure there's some appeal in going to a team with more veterans than youngsters. The bottom line, though, is that ownership can only do so much to get you a championship. At the end of the day, you still need the personnel. You make a good point with the lighter travel schedule, but time will tell how Detroit keeps up in the East. I've always been of the opinion that the east plays a faster game, while the west plays more physically. I'm not sure I agree that it's weaker.
Getting back to Alfredsson, I'm not upset with his decision as an individual. He's well within his rights and he owes us nothing. I was more upset at the way he went about it. It seemed to me like he made up his mind in a day or two and kind of blindsided the ownership here. I could be wrong on that; it's just what I made of the situation. If he'd have handled it a bit less abruptly (e.g., give the organization ample notice; take out a page in the paper thanking fans; said anything to media beyond his Red Wings presser,) his legacy would have been a lot less tarnished than it is now.