Signing(s): George Hill to the Kings (3 years, $57M)

Avs_19

Registered User
Jun 28, 2007
84,831
32,900
He's a good player who'll really help the young guys but it's still kinda weird. I'd want Fox and Buddy out there as much as possible.
 

Virtanen18

SAMCRO
Jan 25, 2014
17,193
832
Vancouver
Yeah I dunno, the roster makeup is a bit odd right now.

PG: Fox, Hill, Temple, Mason
SG: Hield, Temple, Richardson
SF: Jackson?
PF: Randolph, Skal, Giles
C: Cauley-Stein, Koufos, Papagiannis
 

sjsharks92

Shark Tank Commander
Jun 9, 2014
2,521
296
Bay Area, California
It's a good signing for value and given Hill is a great 2-way player and locker room guy. However the Kings are heavy on guards right now. After they drafted Fox and Mason I thought those two would be the starter and backup respectively. Now though it seems that Fox's minutes are reduced and Mason may not be in the rotation at all.

I'd expect a trade of some sort.
 

sjsharks92

Shark Tank Commander
Jun 9, 2014
2,521
296
Bay Area, California
They'll have to try and get Temple and Richardson to play the 3. Hill is capable of playing the 2 since he is a decent spot of shooter. Fox can defend the 2 but I wouldn't want him playing off ball too much.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,705
17,089
Mulberry Street
They draft to prospect Fox to sign... a PG.

Hill took the offer because it was the most $$$ and he may have a chance to start early on. Vivek gon' Vivek.
 

Quid Pro Clowe

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
52,301
9,174
530
Throwing Fox to the wolves straight from the get go isn't a good idea. The west is full of great pg's so it doesn't hurt to have him mentor under a respected pro.

Add the fact year 3 of Hill's contract is only partially guaranteed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad