I think our coaching sucks. We don't get any better at defending certain situations, on PK, on face offs or on goal tending. Grubauer showed what kind of goalie he can be while playing for Avs. Our goalie coaching has sucked for two seasons. We haven't had anyone playing their A game.Team sucks man.
The wrong team showed up in the third period. Start Gruber the rest of the way and hope for the best.
His friends call him Gruber. Start anybody but Jones. Start your sister. Anyone.Too many defensive lapses against a team with all world offensive talent and goaltending that doesn't really deserve to be called that.
Maybe Driedger's ready?
If not we might have to ride Jones, who hasn't been good for some time, during a stretch that will decide our season.
1) Who's Gruber?
2) Grubauer left the game with an injury, Heard it might be the groin again....
His friends call him Gruber. Start anybody but Jones. Start your sister. Anyone.
Yeah I’m kinda thinking this as well. I don’t know enough about the game to be able to decide if it’s the coaching, players or both but I’m kinda leaning towards coaching as well. Unfortunately Hakstol has probably done just a good enough job this year to get another year.I think our coaching sucks. We don't get any better at defending certain situations, on PK, on face offs or on goal tending. Grubauer showed what kind of goalie he can be while playing for Avs. Our goalie coaching has sucked for two seasons. We haven't had anyone playing their A game.
Yeah I’m kinda thinking this as well. I don’t know enough about the game to be able to decide if it’s the coaching, players or both but I’m kinda leaning towards coaching as well. Unfortunately Hakstol has probably done just a good enough job this year to get another year.
Bring up Daccord. The Firebirds will just have to play a walrus.I personally would just put Oleksiak in goalie gear and tape him to the posts.
Would probably get the GAA average down cause he's big....
Hakstol ain't the only one in our coaching staff. Who coaches defenders and who coaches goalies? Would there be better options available? Who is our video coach and does he have the capacity to see and point our mistakes and oppositions weaknesses at a great level? Why doesn't our skill coach get our face offs better?Yeah I’m kinda thinking this as well. I don’t know enough about the game to be able to decide if it’s the coaching, players or both but I’m kinda leaning towards coaching as well. Unfortunately Hakstol has probably done just a good enough job this year to get another year.
I think Jussi Parkkila is a good goalie coach and he can especially work with European goalies and turn them into NHL style.I think it also has to do with the defensive schemes.
The Avs have a great goalie coach but their defensive set up also allows goalies to look good.
Georgiev couldn't make a save last year in New York and now he looks fantastic.
Hakstol ain't the only one in our coaching staff. Who coaches defenders and who coaches goalies?
Agreed. You simply can’t give up a goal a minute into the first and second periods and not have it deflate the bench. I’m not absolving the forwards or the D, but neither Grubauer or Jones inspires confidence that they can do the job consistently.This team is going nowhere with these goalies.
This is fair. The Kraken haven’t done ANYTHING at a consistently high level, and the unsustainable shooting percentage pre All Star Game turned out to be exactly that.I think our coaching sucks. We don't get any better at defending certain situations, on PK, on face offs or on goal tending. Grubauer showed what kind of goalie he can be while playing for Avs. Our goalie coaching has sucked for two seasons. We haven't had anyone playing their A game.
Steve Briere was brought in to coach the goalies this year. He had been Toronto's goalie coach for 6 or 7 years and the person a lot of leaf fans blamed for their inconsistent goaltending.
He was the one that pushed hard for Francis to sign Jones. It all was somewhat questionable during the off-season, but looked really smart by Christmas. Three months later and the moves aren't looking quite as great.
Personally, watching this game, I don't think goaltending was the issue. The defensive coverage lapses and lack of communication left guys open across the ice all game for prime scoring chances.
If a team is leaving guys wide open on the far side of the ice with clean looks at open nets, and the passing lanes are wide enough to drive a Zamboni through, I expect a lot of goals against, and a lot of goalie injuries as they try to sprawl to make those saves time and time again.
I agree that they are related, but poor defense leads to poor goaltending where as poor defense is not necessarily related to poor goaltending.1st goal: Grubauer had time, squared up, Kane fired it right past him. First shot of the game.
2nd goal: Yamamoto sliding past the front of the net. Grubauer anticipates it. Maybe a bit late. Goes right through him.
3rd goal: Huge rebound off Grubauer causes chaos. We can't retrieve the puck. Defense breaks down. McDavid goes McDavid. Kane blasts it into the open net.
4th goal: Defensive breakdown. Both d-men take McDavid. McDavid goes McDavid. Hyman buries it.
5th goal: Evander Kane lugs the mail down the ice. Rips the shot right past Jones who reacts after the puck hits the net.
6th goal: McDavid goes McDavid. Just rips it right through Jones like he isn't there.
I think we have a goalie problem. We also have a defense problem. The two things compliment one another and make the other look worse.
I don't disagree with a lot of that. In fact, nice summary.I agree that they are related, but poor defense leads to poor goaltending where as poor defense is not necessarily related to poor goaltending.
First and last goal were garbage, but I'd argue that 90% of the goalies in the league aren't saving 3 if not all 4 of the goals in between. When a shooter is within 20 feet, it is positioning that is going to stop those hard shots, not reactions. Goalie reactions are based on the puck positioning and the anticipated angle of the stick at the time of the shots contact, not because they can see the puck coming and are quick enough to catch it with a glove. That is why outside shots that are redirected one foot from where they are shot are often goals. The goalie is reacting to the shooters stick and not the puck. Shots from closer range that are just inside the post or under the crossbar are just good shots, and often not bad goaltending. (goals 4 and 5)
As for Seattle's goalies, I won't argue that they are great, but I think we should be realistic. Grubauer's form is not great. He drops early, over reacts and gets himself out of position a lot. He relies on reflexes over positioning and technique.
Jones can't move the way he used to prior to his 2017-18 injury, were he used to be a freak of nature getting across the crease at his size. He now relies on positioning more than reflexes.
Neither goalie is at all above average. This team has a HUGE defensive coverage issue. It forces the goalies to play deeper in the net, cutting down a big advantage.
If this team wants to continue to play poor position puck chase hockey in their own zone, then this team needs an all-world superstar goalie if they want to have league average goaltending.
It's true that Jones and Grubauer are likely not good enough to post a .900+ save percentage behind this team, but neither are 80-90% of the goalies in the league. Unfortunately most of the goalies available are likely all going to have similar results until the team adequately addresses tightening up the coverage, working together as a unit, and shutting down the enormous passing lanes they have been allowing again.
Between the christmas break and the middle of February, the D-zone coverage was much more disciplined and the GAA went down and the SV% went way up. But four weeks ago they started chasing again, the discipline is gone and the results are predictable.