Pre-Game Talk: Game 5. Thursday. Win it to Stay in it.

[Bob b smith]

Habs winning series 4 Games to 2 is good.
Habs beating Ottawa 5 Games to 2 is better.

 

[Born in 1909]

I really don't want us to give up.

http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=65615807&postcount=102

Supreme jerk.

 

[CaptainBenn]

Jeez, Sens fans can't take some adversity.

Trolled some of them who said Habs werent a REAL test...
HABS NEED TO DESTROY THEM TOMORROW

 

[CaptainBenn]

All of a sudden they are some legit contenders SMH

 

[Natey]

Trolled some of them who said Habs werent a REAL test...
HABS NEED TO DESTROY THEM TOMORROW

lol if we're not a real test, I'd hate to see what a team that was a real test would do to them because we've severely outplayed them this series.

If they had even an slightly worse goalie, this series would be 3-1 for us.

Even then, there's no way Anderson keeps up with a .945 SV%.

 

[Crusher117]

MICHEL!

Please overplay Gally and Chuckie, at least give us that.
Also DD, stop getting pushed off the puck please. J'ai confiance en toi mon gros.
Pacioretty, I want a hat trick.
Bouillon, please destroy Neil.
Subban give me two PP goals please.
Markov, I want 5 assists.

Final score 7-1

Habs, lets take this series to 7!

GO HABS GO!!!

 

[Theosis]

Trolled some of them who said Habs werent a REAL test...
HABS NEED TO DESTROY THEM TOMORROW

We aren't a real test for them? Man, I guess all the other teams are going to run them over then. We have outplayed them by quite a large margin in 3 out of the 4 games.

 

[Et le But]

We need a golazo.

 

[Theosis]

MICHEL!

Please overplay Gally and Chuckie, at least give us that.
Also DD, stop getting pushed off the puck please. J'ai confiance en toi mon gros.
Pacioretty, I want a hat trick.
Bouillon, please destroy Neil.
Subban give me two PP goals please.
Markov, I want 5 assists.

Final score 7-1

Habs, lets take this series to 7!

GO HABS GO!!!

Budaj will get pulled in the 1st period and Mike Condon will go on to win the Conn Smythe.

 

[Theosis]

We need a golazo.

Hahah that's amazing.

 

[googlymoogly]

We need a golazo.

If he did actually kick a soccer ball into the net I bet those idiots in Toronto would still count it.

 

[Andy]

tomorrow's win will be more than possible. If we win the boys will have the needed confidence to play in Ottawa Saturday.

Budaj will need to play like a god on saturday and if we win saturday the series will be in our favor Sunday.

We have a chance.

Imagine if Budaj's becomes our Halak 2.0

I don't want Budaj to have to be Halak. I want the team to win. I'm tired of this focus on goaltending. If the team isn't capable of carrying the load then they don't deserve to win. I hope the team from game 2 and the first and second period of game 4 show up, if the team of game 3 and the third period of game 4 show up, we're golfing.

 

[googlymoogly]

Supreme jerk.

He needs to be slapped up side of the head with a used Condon.

 

[icerocket]

We need a golazo.

Holy crap this is amazing.

 

[CrAzYNiNe]

I am still in disbelief they counted the goal. I wonder if things will change next game or if they will find a way to get us eliminated so the habs fans disappear until October.

 

[Account Terminated]

I am still in disbelief they counted the goal. I wonder if things will change next game or if they will find a way to get us eliminated so the habs fans disappear until October.

I tuned into TSN 690 today and caught Bob Mackenzie. He brought some light to the matter and I'll share it here.

The kicking motion that was seen happened after the puck had already hit off his skate, therefor the kicking motion is ruled out. In that case, it is a redirection, which is allowed. What is stupid about the rule is that you can't kick it in, but you can place your skate in a position to have the puck knock off of it and into the net.

In other words, you can kick it in but you can't REALLY kick it in.

Bob said they really need to take a look at that rule and either fix it or re-arrange the way it is explained because it has left so many people confused on the matter.

 

[icerocket]

Nah that kicking motion you see after contact is the follow-through. The same motion you get after a golf or baseball swing or you know KICKING IT IN!!!!!!!

 

[Seb]

Price shutout

 

[Et le But]

I tuned into TSN 690 today and caught Bob Mackenzie. He brought some light to the matter and I'll share it here.

The kicking motion that was seen happened after the puck had already hit off his skate, therefor the kicking motion is ruled out. In that case, it is a redirection, which is allowed. What is stupid about the rule is that you can't kick it in, but you can place your skate in a position to have the puck knock off of it and into the net.

In other words, you can kick it in but you can't REALLY kick it in.

Bob said they really need to take a look at that rule and either fix it or re-arrange the way it is explained because it has left so many people confused on the matter.

So it's okay to intentionally control the puck with your foot except if you move your leg a certain amount when doing so? What a dumb rule.

 

[Account Terminated]

GDT is now up.

 

[Jee]

It was a kick motion, but we have to move on... Who the hell cares about what happened last game, let's focus on tomorrow.

 

[Natey]

I tuned into TSN 690 today and caught Bob Mackenzie. He brought some light to the matter and I'll share it here.

The kicking motion that was seen happened after the puck had already hit off his skate, therefor the kicking motion is ruled out. In that case, it is a redirection, which is allowed. What is stupid about the rule is that you can't kick it in, but you can place your skate in a position to have the puck knock off of it and into the net.

In other words, you can kick it in but you can't REALLY kick it in.

Bob said they really need to take a look at that rule and either fix it or re-arrange the way it is explained because it has left so many people confused on the matter.

I'm more mad about the Sen holding Price's stick on the tying goal than the kick/redirect.