It's a legal matter. If you're suggesting that the arbitrator should be concerned about the comment on society that his ruling represents, I'm not sure you're familiar with what his job actually is.Yes, but who picked the arbitrator? Donald Trump?
It is a sad comment on society when the suspension is cut in half.
Also one could argue that the arbitrator didn't do his job..
Sorry I didn't realize that there was a clause in the CBA about the maximum number of games that a player can be suspended for beating their wife. 18 it is then.It's a legal matter. If you're suggesting that the arbitrator should be concerned about the comment on society that his ruling represents, I'm not sure you're familiar with what his job actually is.
Just like in the Wideman case, the arbitrator doesn't get to make a ruling and override the league. What he's ruling on is whether the league broke its own rules per the CBA.
I would say society would be in even more trouble if we didn't have standards for punishment as well as behaviour.
Hmmm... dirty hit on another player... 20 games
Beat your wife where the police and courts get involved ... 18 games.
Something's not right.
You take the good, you take the bad and there you have the facts of playing with Mike Smith.
Put Rittich in
1) Wasn't his wife (semantics)Sorry I didn't realize that there was a clause in the CBA about the maximum number of games that a player can be suspended for beating their wife. 18 it is then.
1) Ok.. girlfriend. I'm sure they are living together, the same as a husband and wife do.1) Wasn't his wife (semantics)
2) CBA doesn't have a set number, hence the problem leading to arbitration in the first place.
3) He's been tried and convicted by a court of law. The NHL is not law but an organization that allows employment.
3)Well why is he being suspended at all then? ...He's been tried and convicted in a court of law. Punishment (3 months probation) for the assault has been meted out by the courts and is being served by the defendant.