Ace Rimmer
Stoke me a clipper.
I'll take Colborne's penalty (where he's over-aggressive) over a lazy hook or hold 1473 times out of ten.
I'll take Colborne's penalty (where he's over-aggressive) over a lazy hook or hold 1473 times out of ten.
Exactly. There's a learning curve here for a lot of guys who have never been here before.Flames hung in and at times outplayed one of the better teams in the league in the playoffs. Some rookie mistakes cost us in a game that could've been won, but they will learn. This team is going to be amazing in a few years.
Flames hung in and at times outplayed one of the better teams in the league in the playoffs. Some rookie mistakes cost us this game that could've been won, but they will learn. This team is going to be amazing in a few years.
Flames hung in and at times outplayed one of the better teams in the league in the playoffs. Some rookie mistakes cost us this game that could've been won, but they will learn. This team is going to be amazing in a few years.
that's all I have been trying to say. Multiple players are at fault as is the case in any loss.Good. He also shares the blame then.
Because Colborne can control when Beauchemin bleeds? C'mon he was victimized by one of the stupidest rules in the league. We've all seen much worse high sticks not draw blood.Hooks and holds are never 4 minutes, though.
I feel like **** right now but we need to remember that this team is just going to get better
Exactly. There's a learning curve here for a lot of guys who have never been here before.
Last I checked, we're still in a rebuild.
that's all I have been trying to say. Multiple players are at fault as is the case in any loss.
Because Colborne can control when Beauchemin bleeds? C'mon he was victimized by one of the stupidest rules in the league. We've all seen much worse high sticks not draw blood.
You can if you want, but I am not backing down. Blaming 1 player when there was a bunch of **** ups is completely unreasonable.Look, 1TG - let’s agree to disagree, OK?
You can if you want, but I am not backing down. Blaming 1 player when there was a bunch of **** ups is completely unreasonable.
You can if you want, but I am not backing down. Blaming 1 player when there was a bunch of **** ups is completely unreasonable.
It would definitely be an improvement but I'm not sure we "need" to, if Hudler showed up (or was healthy) I think we would look pretty good as Jones and Colborne overall have been a quite formidable middle 6 RW pair.We need to package players off for a top 6 RWer
It would definitely be an improvement but I'm not sure we "need: to, if Hudler showed up (or was healthy) I think we would look pretty good as Jones and Colborne overall have been a quite formidable middle 6 RW pair.
I never said not to do it. I just don't think it's as big of a need as you do. I'd be looking to improve our defense first.Hudler is fine for the first line but we need more reliable depth scoring. Jones is good with Stajan on the third line and is a nice fit for the shut down line. Colborne can be that 2nd line RW if he can rebound from this sophomore year, but if we can package for an upgrade in a RWer that fits why not do it.
I actually think Jones should be our #2 RW and Colborne the #3. Colborne would look very good with Boums and Stajan IMO.Bouma-Stajan-Jones is a fantastic third line, but not convinced that Colborne is the guy for the 2nd line. Really hoping either Poirier or Klimchuk can make the jump next season.
We need to package players off for a top 6 RWer
I don't think so. 1 second on the clock at the end of the 2nd period in the Ducks end he and he does that? Entirely his fault that he drew blood.
It would definitely be an improvement but I'm not sure we "need: to, if Hudler showed up (or was healthy) I think we would look pretty good as Jones and Colborne overall have been a quite formidable middle 6 RW pair.
I never said not to do it. I just don't think it's as big of a need as you do. I'd be looking to improve our defense first.