Steve Yzerlland
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2018
- 8,242
- 4,071
Directly in front of the ref. Larkin was a moron there...That was a brain dead play
Pretty much awful
Directly in front of the ref. Larkin was a moron there...That was a brain dead play
Pretty much awful
If and maybes? You're the one trying to argue the Wings managed to win a game without scoring 4 goals. Using a game in which they scored 4 goals.
It had pop to it. And like I said the ref was right there.Brain dead? it was barely a slash
That might've been what Larkin was arguing. A bit of embellishing, perhaps.Starting to not like this Addison guy. Dumb penalty by Larkin but chucking your glove off...
I was trying to avoid the low-hanging fruit, but that was my first thought.
There have been 5 Wing wins where the opposition scored 2 or fewer goals. None of that changes that the Wings have not won a singular game scoring fewer than 4 goals.Looked it up agai. My bad. They won 4-1 against MIN. So it’s 2 in which 3 goals were enough. The closest was 4-3 OT vs NYI.
he clearly got him right on the hand. that will get called every time.That might've been what Larkin was arguing. A bit of embellishing, perhaps.
That was a massive hack, what are you talking aboutBrain dead? it was barely a slash
They said the same thing about George Washington's rebels and they won!Even if the Wings pull off a win tonight - the chances of them turning this season around is pretty slim.