GDT: Game 24: Vancouver Canucks @ Los Angeles Kings | Tuesday, Dec 1 2015 - 7:30PM PT

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingsKnight

Reset in progress
Nov 12, 2008
4,563
247
CA
Tv291Xh.jpg


VANCOUVER CANUCKS @ LOS ANGELES KINGS
Tuesday, December 1, 2015 - 7:30PM PT
Staples Center | Los Angeles, CA
TV: FS-W | Radio: AM 790 KABC

BGistRo.jpg
|
nAeYazv.jpg
VANCOUVER|
LOS ANGELES
(9-9-7 25pts)|
(13-8-1 27pts)
|
D. Sedin - H. Sedin - Hansen |
Pearson - Kopitar - Gaborik
Higgins - McCann - Vrbata |
Lucic - Carter - Toffoli
Burrows - Horvat - Virtanen |
Brown - Shore - Lewis
Prust - Cracknell - Dorsett |
Clifford - Andreoff - Nolan
|
Edler - Tanev |
McNabb - Doughty
Hamhuis - Weber |
Muzzin - Martinez
Sbisa - Bartkowski |
Ehrhoff - McBain
|
Markstrom / Miller |
Quick / Enroth​
Canucks lineup expected to change due to injuries

NEWS | NOTES
Kings are on a 4 game homestand before spending 10 of the next 11 on the road.
11/28 CHI 2 at LAK 3 OT
12/1 VAN at LAK
12/5 PIT at LAK
12/6 TBL at LAK

MATCHUP
10/13 VAN 3 at LAK 0
12/1 VAN at LAK
12/28 LAK at VAN
3/7 VAN at LAK
4/4 LAK at VAN

|GP|Record|Pts|ROW|Home|Away|Last 10|Streak
Los Angeles|23|14-8-1|29|13|8-5-0|6-3-1|6-3-1|Won 1
Vancouver|25|9-9-7|25|8|3-4-3|6-5-4|3-5-2|Lost 1

|G/GP|GA/GP|PP%|PK%|Shots/GP|SA/GP|FOW%
Los Angeles|2.48|2.13|19.1|83.9|32.1|28.4|48.5%
Vancouver|2.72|2.72|19.8|77.2|30.7|29.5|47.3%

STANDINGS
# | [pre] Pacific [/pre] | GP |
[pre] W-L-OT [/pre]|PTS|ROW
1|[pre] Los Angeles[/pre]|
23|
14-8-1|
29|
13
2|[pre] San Jose[/pre]|
23|
14-9-0|
28|
13
3|[pre] Arizona[/pre]|
23|
13-9-1|
27|
13
4|[pre] Vancouver[/pre]|
25|
9-9-7|
25|
8
5|[pre] Anaheim[/pre]|
25|
9-11-5|
23|
8
6|[pre] Calgary[/pre]|
24|
8-14-2|
18|
8
7|[pre] Edmonton[/pre]|
25|
8-15-2|
18|
7​

SEASON SCHEDULE | RESULTS
P5a5SUi.jpg


Disclaimer: “GDT may not be 100% accurate. I got the line combos from your mom. I used to have Center Ice, Gamecenter Live, and an undercover concession worker in each arena, but this **** costs money. I will admit that my pet otter is using all up that money on his worsening opium problem. I try to not be an enabler, but I haven't had a sea urchin problem in months. Then I thought, why should I pay all this money and have a sea urchin problem to appease fans of random teams that I don't even care about anyway? Unless you are willing to take a bunch of sea urchins off of my hands, don't ***** if I get the lines wrong.†- BF
 

Little Psycho

I solemnly swear I'm up to no good
Feb 4, 2007
34,732
12,842
Non-Yah
How the heck does this team have awesome numbers against the central division but poor stats against the Pacific? Hope the Kings show up and don't underestimate the Canucks.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,392
7,472
Visit site
Not including EN or SO goals

1-4 at home against Pacific teams
8GF, 1.60 per game
17GA, 3.4

13-5 against everyone else
46GF, 2.56
31GA, 1.72

7-1 at home against anyone but the Pacific
22GF, 2.75
12GA, 1.50

At least 3 goals against in 4 of the 5 Pacific home games, and shutout in the Vancouver game where they only let in 2 before an empty netter. It's a weird stat.
 

lumbergh

It was an idea. I didn't say it was a good idea.
Jan 8, 2007
6,367
5,641
Richmond, VA
Only 2 points ahead of this joke of a team. Amazing.

Let's be honest here. The Kings aren't exactly lighting the league on fire. What part of 7-5-1 (basically all of November) in the last 13 gives the impression that the Kings are some sort of a dominant team? It's a good team that has some holes. The Kings are going to be lucky to win the division in the end, but it's going to be tight all season.
 

Raccoon Jesus

Todd McLellan is an inside agent
Oct 30, 2008
62,222
62,923
I.E.
Let's be honest here. The Kings aren't exactly lighting the league on fire. What part of 7-5-1 (basically all of November) in the last 13 gives the impression that the Kings are some sort of a dominant team? It's a good team that has some holes. The Kings are going to be lucky to win the division in the end, but it's going to be tight all season.

14-5-1 since the first train wreck games, 3rd in the conference, 7th in the league, +8 goal differential, 56.6 CF% (2 full % better than the next team) 1st in the league....

This is all while rocking a 98.86 PDO which is one of the lowest in the league, suggesting despite being more dominant than not we've had some bad luck with shooting %...

Don't be scared to appreciate this team for what it is. Every team has holes. NYR is tearing it up--they're also at going to experience a crash at some point with their ungodly 105 PDO and 2nd worst CF% in the league. Arizona is in a similar boat. And so on. I would actually bank on a lengthy winning/points streak soon if I were a betting man.

This team is ripe for trending up. We haven't even seen close to their best yet.
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,140
7,488
Calgary, AB
Let's be honest here. The Kings aren't exactly lighting the league on fire. What part of 7-5-1 (basically all of November) in the last 13 gives the impression that the Kings are some sort of a dominant team? It's a good team that has some holes. The Kings are going to be lucky to win the division in the end, but it's going to be tight all season.

I think that the Kings will be UNlucky and win the division. Winner of the pacific will get the 4th best team in the central (top team in central likely will get 5th best in central). 4th best in the central likley > whatever team finishes 3rd in the pacific.
Would rather LA finish 2nd or 3rd in the pacific
 

kingsholygrail

We've made progress - Robitaille
Sponsor
Dec 21, 2006
81,859
16,292
Derpifornia
I think that the Kings will be UNlucky and win the division. Winner of the pacific will get the 4th best team in the central (top team in central likely will get 5th best in central). 4th best in the central likley > whatever team finishes 3rd in the pacific.
Would rather LA finish 2nd or 3rd in the pacific

LA has done better against the Central than the Pacific so far this season. Haven't we only lost once to the Central so far? And it was Chicago on the road.
 

tsanuri

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
6,823
342
Central Coast CA
14-5-1 since the first train wreck games, 3rd in the conference, 7th in the league, +8 goal differential, 56.6 CF% (2 full % better than the next team) 1st in the league....

This is all while rocking a 98.86 PDO which is one of the lowest in the league, suggesting despite being more dominant than not we've had some bad luck with shooting %...

Don't be scared to appreciate this team for what it is. Every team has holes. NYR is tearing it up--they're also at going to experience a crash at some point with their ungodly 105 PDO and 2nd worst CF% in the league. Arizona is in a similar boat. And so on. I would actually bank on a lengthy winning/points streak soon if I were a betting man.

This team is ripe for trending up. We haven't even seen close to their best yet.

Not sure why so many don't see this. We are really in such good shape. Goals have been tough for a few years but even with all the changes on the back end we are still second in GA/A.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad