GDT: Game #14 || "Choker Awards" || Capitals @ Canucks || Mon Oct 28/13 7PM SNET-VAN

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pseudonymous*

Guest
Yeah, you totally cleared things up. :laugh:

Your entire argument has been a straw man, goal-post shifting mess since it started. You can't use the argument of small sample size when the same thing applies to your side, for example.

The Canucks powerplay by all accounts should be much better than it is, and statistics back it up. You claim that because of some very bad puck luck, and forwards seemingly flubbing some good opportunities, our PP is awful, and will continue this way.

Which one of these arguments sounds more logical?


:shakehead

lol your guys argument is they get alot of shots and can't maintain a low shooting percent. hahahahahahaha

im suggesting shots lower , allowing for a bit of an increase in shooting percent over the course of 82 games, which still allows for a poor power play and that is a bad argument. :laugh: oh man

sure, they get alot of shots, so theyll have a good pp come years end. riiight

im not using any stats from a sample size. not sure what youre reading
 

Lord Flacko*

Guest
Crowd was getting restless when they couldn't break out of their zone lol. Painful. Good play by Higgins and Santa though.
 

Upoil

Zaboomafoo
Aug 8, 2010
995
265
Bermuda
:shakehead

lol your guys argument is they get alot of shots and can't maintain a low shooting percent. hahahahahahaha

im suggesting shots lower , allowing for a bit of an increase in shooting percent over the course of 82 games, which still allows for a poor power play and that is a bad argument. :laugh: oh man

sure, they get alot of shots, so theyll have a good pp come years end. riiight

Why you laugh at simple concept?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad