Not sure how not favouring or being more sympathetic to someone well known, above the man in the street equates to that, but happy to bow out.
I can only speak for myself, but I'm sure many probably feel the same, but nobody is favouring Peat or being more sympathetic to him than the average Joe on the street. I'd feel the same way if he was just some dude down the street. And the fact is he can barely even be considered well known. 130 games in the NHL didn't make him a household name, nor did it make him rich. Drop the name Stephen Peat onto any hockey fan. I bet for many the first reaction would be, "Who?"
Fact is when you're famous or semi-famous, your story gets put into the public eye more than an average person. This specific case tends to be more news worthy because of the issues with CTE and pro sports now days.
This isn't about a pro star coming down to earth. This isn't a player trying to cope with not knowing what to do with their lives after hockey. This is about a guy who has brain damage from playing hockey and fighting.
Part of his brain is damaged. It's not working right. You're saying it's simple as 2+2=4, but you can't seem to process that probably in this guys brain 2+2=5.
To put it another way, if someone isn't mentally sound from brain damage, and you expect them to make sound decisions, it's like expecting a legless person to be able to kick a 50 yard field goal.